Hello Arnd,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 05:26:22PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 22 June 2012, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 12:20:14PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > Drivers should never need to modify the data of a device id. So it can
> > > be const which in tu
On Friday 22 June 2012, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 12:20:14PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Drivers should never need to modify the data of a device id. So it can
> > be const which in turn allows more consts in the driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
> > -
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 12:20:14PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Drivers should never need to modify the data of a device id. So it can
> be const which in turn allows more consts in the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
> ---
> (Cc += lkml + Grant)
>
> Hello,
>
> this might introd
Drivers should never need to modify the data of a device id. So it can
be const which in turn allows more consts in the driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
---
(Cc += lkml + Grant)
Hello,
this might introduce warnings in drivers that access the data member
without using const, so this is de
