On 19 November 2012 09:24, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 12 November 2012 09:03, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 12 November 2012 01:12, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think the size is stored in the dtb. It is only in the dts. You
need to
On 19 November 2012 12:00, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Firstly you tried square braces [ ], I am not sure if that is allowed.
Can you point me to the specification?
http://www.devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage
a-byte-data-property = [0x01 0x23 0x34 0x56];
And simply passing
On 11/18/2012 11:41 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 19 November 2012 12:05, Rajanikanth HV rajanikanth...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 November 2012 12:00, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Firstly you tried square braces [ ], I am not sure if that is allowed.
Can you point me to the
On 19 November 2012 21:58, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
Support for byte- and word- properties is relatively recent I believe
(or at least, the /bits/ syntax is). Which dtc version are you using?
Ok, i was on a older version. I just saw this patch now:
commit
On 12 November 2012 09:03, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 12 November 2012 01:12, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think the size is stored in the dtb. It is only in the dts. You
need to define the size in the binding definitions and use '/bits/'
annotation.
On 19 November 2012 11:54, Rajanikanth HV rajanikanth...@linaro.org wrote:
data1 = /bits/ 8 0x50 0x60 0x70;
as per spec, format for data byte defines will be:
data1 = [ 0x50 0x60 0x70 ];
however, i see a parse error from device tree compiler when i tried.
Firstly you tried square braces [ ],
On 19 November 2012 12:05, Rajanikanth HV rajanikanth...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 November 2012 12:00, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Firstly you tried square braces [ ], I am not sure if that is allowed.
Can you point me to the specification?
Ping!!
On 7 November 2012 09:52, viresh kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
+#define of_property_read_array(_np, _pname, _out, _sz)
\
+ while (_sz--)
On 11 November 2012 19:42, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/06/2012 10:22 PM, viresh kumar wrote:
cluster0: cluster@0 {
+ data1 = 0x50 0x60 0x70;
+ data2 = 0x5000 0x6000 0x7000;
+ data3 =
On 12 November 2012 01:12, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/11/2012 11:27 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 11 November 2012 19:42, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/06/2012 10:22 PM, viresh kumar wrote:
cluster0: cluster@0 {
+ data1
On 11/06/2012 10:22 PM, viresh kumar wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
+#define of_property_read_array(_np, _pname, _out, _sz)
\
+ while (_sz--) \
+ *_out++
On 10/25/2012 11:20 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
This adds following helper routines:
- of_property_read_u8_array()
- of_property_read_u16_array()
- of_property_read_u8()
- of_property_read_u16()
First two actually share most of the code with of_property_read_u32_array(),
so
the common part
12 matches
Mail list logo