Reworked patch for latest feedback. I'm still basing this on Jason Cooper's
tree, given how much time has passed should I be rebasing against something
else or is this still fine?
One thing I noticed is that with only the first patch applied (which no
longer calls kirkwood_nand_init) the device
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:06:39AM +0100, Jamie Lentin wrote:
Reworked patch for latest feedback. I'm still basing this on Jason Cooper's
tree, given how much time has passed should I be rebasing against something
else or is this still fine?
Typically, work should be based against a stable
dies at Gating clock of unused units, presumably as CGC_RUNIT isn't set.
Is this something known or is it worth further investigation?
That could potentially mess up a future bisect. However, it would only
crop up for dnskw boards. I'll let Grant weigh in on this since he's
the one who
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 03:24:45PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
dies at Gating clock of unused units, presumably as CGC_RUNIT isn't set.
Is this something known or is it worth further investigation?
That could potentially mess up a future bisect. However, it would only
crop up for dnskw
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:04:40 +0100, Jason Cooper ja...@lakedaemon.net
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 03:24:45PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
dies at Gating clock of unused units, presumably as CGC_RUNIT
isn't set.
Is this something known or is it worth further investigation?
That could
