Hi Graeme,
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On 05/04/13 17:30, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > Hi Ian,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:55:10PM +, Ian Lartey wrote:
> >> This patchset adds to the support for the Palmas series of PMIC chips.
> >>
> >> Some of the patc
Hi Ian,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:55:10PM +, Ian Lartey wrote:
> This patchset adds to the support for the Palmas series of PMIC chips.
>
> Some of the patches have previously been submitted individually.
> The DT bindings doc has been added first due to comments that it was missing.
>
> Pa
On Friday 22 March 2013 08:25 PM, Ian Lartey wrote:
This patchset adds to the support for the Palmas series of PMIC chips.
Some of the patches have previously been submitted individually.
The DT bindings doc has been added first due to comments that it was missing.
Patches based on linux-next-2
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 06:04:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:55:10 + Ian Lartey wrote:
> > Patches based on linux-next-20130319
> I can't really comment on the patch set except to say that you should not
> base on linux-next, you should base on the tree to which
Hi Ian,
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:55:10 + Ian Lartey wrote:
>
> This patchset adds to the support for the Palmas series of PMIC chips.
>
> Some of the patches have previously been submitted individually.
> The DT bindings doc has been added first due to comments that it was missing.
>
> Patche
