On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 01:19:39 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:07:45AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 11:57:48AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 08:27:39PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Sat,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:24:11PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 14 January 2013, Thierry Reding wrote:
It certainly sounds like a less complicated way to do it. But it also
involves adding a function with a made up name and drop a function with
a perfectly good name instead. I
Hi,
I am sorry, but I do not consider a function that was added a little
over a year ago as a canon. If you look at the uses of EADDRNOTAVAIL
it
is used predominantly in networking code to indicate that attempted
_network_ address is not available.
EBUSY might
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 02:06:23PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Hi,
I am sorry, but I do not consider a function that was added a little
over a year ago as a canon. If you look at the uses of
EADDRNOTAVAIL it
is used predominantly in networking code to indicate that
Hi,
Then, I added the example code in the documentation using EADDRNOTAVAIL.
Yes, I was brave with this one. Yet, EINVAL, EBUSY, ENOENT, did not
really cut it and are so heavily used in drivers that they turned into a
generic something is wrong error. I tried here to use a not overloaded
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 10:23:52AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:19:39AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:07:45AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 11:57:48AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:49:59PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 10:23:52AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:19:39AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:07:45AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:16:44AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:49:59PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 10:23:52AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:19:39AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at
On Monday 14 January 2013, Thierry Reding wrote:
It certainly sounds like a less complicated way to do it. But it also
involves adding a function with a made up name and drop a function with
a perfectly good name instead. I wouldn't even know what name to choose
for the new API.
How about
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:24:11PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 14 January 2013, Thierry Reding wrote:
It certainly sounds like a less complicated way to do it. But it also
involves adding a function with a made up name and drop a function with
a perfectly good name instead. I
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:07:45AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 11:57:48AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 08:27:39PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:06:58AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 11:57:48AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 08:27:39PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:06:58AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 01:15:08PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
[...]
@@ -735,25 +738,16 @@
On Sunday 06 January 2013 04:48 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 04:50:58PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
HI Dmitry,
Thanks for quick review.
I will take care of your comment in next version. Some have my answer.
On Saturday 05 January 2013 01:36 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:06:58AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 01:15:08PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
[...]
@@ -735,25 +738,16 @@ static int tegra_kbc_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
spin_lock_init(kbc-lock);
setup_timer(kbc-timer,
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 08:27:39PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:06:58AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 01:15:08PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
[...]
@@ -735,25 +738,16 @@ static int tegra_kbc_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
HI Dmitry,
Thanks for quick review.
I will take care of your comment in next version. Some have my answer.
On Saturday 05 January 2013 01:36 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Laxman,
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 01:15:08PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Use devm_* for memory, clock, input device
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 04:50:58PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
HI Dmitry,
Thanks for quick review.
I will take care of your comment in next version. Some have my answer.
On Saturday 05 January 2013 01:36 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Laxman,
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 01:15:08PM
17 matches
Mail list logo
