On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:44:44PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:27:04PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 06:15:53PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 04:57:46PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > There must
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:27:04PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 06:15:53PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 04:57:46PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]
> > There must be a common way for all devices to link to the topology, though.
> >
> > The top
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 06:15:53PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 04:57:46PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > [ Note: please aim to CC devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org with any
> > patches or bindings relevant to device tree. ]
> >
> > [ Lorenzo, there's a question for y
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 04:57:46PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> [ Note: please aim to CC devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org with any
> patches or bindings relevant to device tree. ]
>
> [ Lorenzo, there's a question for you further down this mail. ]
[...]
> > > > + If using the memory mapped in
[ Note: please aim to CC devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org with any
patches or bindings relevant to device tree. ]
[ Lorenzo, there's a question for you further down this mail. ]
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:28:58PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:08:47PM +0100, Rohit Vasw
