Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] MBus device tree binding

2013-06-18 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
Hi Sebastian, On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 01:33:37PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 06/18/13 13:25, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > In the example below there's an extract of a device tree showing how > > the internal-regs and pcie nodes can be represented: > > > > #define MBUS_ID(target,attr

Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] MBus device tree binding

2013-06-18 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
On 06/18/13 13:25, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: In the example below there's an extract of a device tree showing how the internal-regs and pcie nodes can be represented: #define MBUS_ID(target,attributes) (((target) << 24) | ((attributes) << 16)) soc { compatible = "m

[PATCH v3 00/12] MBus device tree binding

2013-06-18 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
In the current device tree binding proposal, for each MBus' child device there's an mbus-node 'ranges' property entry, in addition to the ranges property of the child itself. For each of this mbus-node ranges entry, the MBus driver creates a decoding window for it, on probe time. For instance, in