Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-13 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings. While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what makes

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-13 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings. While it is a PPC

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: - hcall-instructions potentially interesting, but given that for Xen we are quite happy with HVC, we are not going to add any

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote: Do you think it's feasible to standardise on some interoperable ABI for kvm and Xen? This sounds pretty optimistic, but I'm not aware of all the technicalities, or what possible third-party hypervisors are out there. If we could do it, it would be

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Rob Herring wrote: On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings. While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-12 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: On 08/16/2012 10:35 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org CC: David Vrabel

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-12 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings. While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what makes sense. See section 7.5:

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-12 Thread Rob Herring
On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings. While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what makes sense. See section 7.5:

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-08-27 Thread Rob Herring
On 08/16/2012 10:35 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org CC: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com ---

[PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-08-16 Thread Stefano Stabellini
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org CC: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt | 22 ++ 1 files