See the previous version of this patchset for further context:
http://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org/msg35753.html
This new proposal is an attempt to address some issues raised about the PCIe
'fake' windows mapping present in the previous version.
Instead of defining a
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 06:39:11PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> ranges =
> <0x8200 0 0x4 MBUS_ID(0xf0, 0x01)
> 0x4 0 0x2000 /* Port 0.0 registers */
> 0x8200 0 0x42000 MBUS_ID(0xf0, 0x01)
>
Dear Jason Gunthorpe,
Thanks for your quick feedback!
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 16:08:20 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 06:39:11PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>
> > ranges =
> ><0x8200 0 0x4 MBUS_ID(0xf0, 0x01)
> > 0x4
On Friday 05 July 2013, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> See the previous version of this patchset for further context:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org/msg35753.html
>
> This new proposal is an attempt to address some issues raised about the PCIe
> 'fake' windows mappi
On Saturday 06 July 2013, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This is a good try, but this coding doesn't work...
>
> Recall the long discussion that came up during the original
> development of this binding. The OF spec says this:
>
> In particular, the phys.hi fields of the child address spaces in the
>
Jason, Arnd,
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 18:39:11 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> See the previous version of this patchset for further context:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org/msg35753.html
>
> This new proposal is an attempt to address some issues raised about the P
On Saturday 06 July 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Arnd, Jason, if you could confirm that you both agree with this DT
> binding soon, Ezequiel and I would quickly adapt the code accordingly,
> and hopefully converge towards a final patch set.
Looks all good from what I can tell.
Arnd
___
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 01:38:35AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 06 July 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Arnd, Jason, if you could confirm that you both agree with this DT
> > binding soon, Ezequiel and I would quickly adapt the code accordingly,
> > and hopefully converge towards a f
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:42:25AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 01:38:35AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 July 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > > Arnd, Jason, if you could confirm that you both agree with this DT
> > > binding soon, Ezequiel and I would q
