Re: [PATCH v6 8/9] mmc: dw_mmc: add support for implementation specific callbacks

2012-10-16 Thread Thomas Abraham
On 4 October 2012 18:11, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > Monday, September 24, Chris Ball >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Sep 20 2012, Thomas Abraham wrote: >> >> In non-Exynos platform, host->drv_data has NULL. >> > >> > Yes, sorry, I missed that. >> > >> > Chris, should I fix this and send the updated patch or sha

Re: [PATCH v6 8/9] mmc: dw_mmc: add support for implementation specific callbacks

2012-09-23 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Thu, Sep 20 2012, Thomas Abraham wrote: >> In non-Exynos platform, host->drv_data has NULL. > > Yes, sorry, I missed that. > > Chris, should I fix this and send the updated patch or shall I send a > separate fix patch. A separate fix patch would be good, please. (I'd normally take an upda

Re: [PATCH v6 8/9] mmc: dw_mmc: add support for implementation specific callbacks

2012-09-19 Thread Thomas Abraham
On 19 September 2012 19:10, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > On Tuesday, September 18, 2012, Thomas Abraham > wrote: >> -int dw_mci_pltfm_register(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +int dw_mci_pltfm_register(struct platform_device *pdev, >> + struct dw_mci_drv_data *drv_data) >>

[PATCH v6 8/9] mmc: dw_mmc: add support for implementation specific callbacks

2012-09-17 Thread Thomas Abraham
The core dw-mshc controller driver can let platform specific implementations of the dw-mshc controller to control the hardware as required by such implementations. This is acheived by invoking implementation specific (optional) callbacks. Define the list of callbacks supported the add invocation po