Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] SH pinctrl DT support

2013-06-20 Thread James Hogan
On 18/06/13 10:05, Linus Walleij wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:51 AM, James Hogan james.ho...@imgtec.com wrote: Should we be standardizing the pins/groups/function properties too, since the strings are pretty much passed straight through? The usage seems pretty similar between the

Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] SH pinctrl DT support

2013-06-18 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com wrote: Hello, Here's the seventh (and hopefully final) version of the SuperH and SH Mobile pin controllers (PFC) DT support patch set. The patches have been rebased on the for-next branch of the

Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] SH pinctrl DT support

2013-06-18 Thread James Hogan
On 18/06/13 09:05, Linus Walleij wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com wrote: Hello, Here's the seventh (and hopefully final) version of the SuperH and SH Mobile pin controllers (PFC) DT support patch set. The patches have been

Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] SH pinctrl DT support

2013-06-18 Thread Heiko Stübner
Am Dienstag, 18. Juni 2013, 10:05:30 schrieb Linus Walleij: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com wrote: Hello, Here's the seventh (and hopefully final) version of the SuperH and SH Mobile pin controllers (PFC) DT support patch

[PATCH v7 0/3] SH pinctrl DT support

2013-06-17 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello, Here's the seventh (and hopefully final) version of the SuperH and SH Mobile pin controllers (PFC) DT support patch set. The patches have been rebased on the for-next branch of the pinctrl repository. All ARM-specific patches have been dropped and will be pushed through to ARM SoC tree in