From: Alexander Shishkin
As reported by Dan Carpenter, there is a NULL check in udc_start() that
follows a dereference of the pointer that's being checked. However, at
that point udc pointer shouldn't ever be NULL and if it is, the dereference
should cause an oops.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shish
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 02:56:18PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> From: Alexander Shishkin
>
> As reported by Dan Carpenter, there is a NULL check in udc_start() that
> follows a dereference of the pointer that's being checked. However, at
> that point udc pointer shouldn't ever be NULL and if it i
Dear Richard Zhao,
> From: Alexander Shishkin
>
> As reported by Dan Carpenter, there is a NULL check in udc_start() that
> follows a dereference of the pointer that's being checked. However, at
> that point udc pointer shouldn't ever be NULL and if it is, the dereference
> should cause an oops.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:43:11PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 02:56:18PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > From: Alexander Shishkin
> >
> > As reported by Dan Carpenter, there is a NULL check in udc_start() that
> > follows a dereference of the pointer that's being checked. Howe
