Dear Andrew Lunn,
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:45:59 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
The patchset works only for Armada 370 and Armada XP SoC, not for Kirkwood.
For some reason I was completely sure there wasn't any DT-enabled Kirkwood
boards with PCIe support.
I had a quick look at Dove and
Hi Grant, Arnd, Jason:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:57:29AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
Here's the new MBus DT binding, implementing the changes proposed
by Thomas when we discussed the previous patchset:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg257170.html
As far as I know, this
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:57:29AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
Here's the new MBus DT binding, implementing the changes proposed
by Thomas when we discussed the previous patchset:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg257170.html
As far as I know, this round fixes *all* the
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:57:29AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
Here's the new MBus DT binding, implementing the changes proposed
by Thomas when we discussed the previous patchset:
Andrew,
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 07:38:47PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:57:29AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
Here's the new MBus DT binding, implementing the changes proposed
by Thomas when we discussed
Here's the new MBus DT binding, implementing the changes proposed
by Thomas when we discussed the previous patchset:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg257170.html
As far as I know, this round fixes *all* the concerns raised in the past
and therefore I'd like to get Acked-by's from all