On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:55:43PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:43:02PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Thank you for having a look Grant.
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:24:48PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:20:39 +, Lorenzo Pieralisi
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:43:02PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Thank you for having a look Grant.
>
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:24:48PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:20:39 +, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:07:34AM +, David Gib
Thank you for having a look Grant.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:24:48PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:20:39 +, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:07:34AM +, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:48:16AM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wr
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:20:39 +, Lorenzo Pieralisi
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:07:34AM +, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:48:16AM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > > > I think we need to post what we have, it is really complex to explain
> > > > > the issue w
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:07:34AM +, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:48:16AM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:09:28AM +, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:06:57PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > > Hi David,
> > > >
>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:48:16AM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:09:28AM +, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:06:57PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > thanks for your feedback.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:57
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:09:28AM +, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:06:57PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > thanks for your feedback.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:57:14PM +, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:21:02PM +,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:06:57PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> thanks for your feedback.
>
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:57:14PM +, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:21:02PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
[snip]
> > > Each foo@200 reg property maps to
Hi David,
thanks for your feedback.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:57:14PM +, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:21:02PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > in order to come up with a solid solution to the affinity bindings concept
> > we are facing in the ARM world
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:21:02PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in order to come up with a solid solution to the affinity bindings concept
> we are facing in the ARM world, I am posting this RFC so that hopefully people
> on the list can chime in and help us in this endeavour.
>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:52:06PM +, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:21:02PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > in order to come up with a solid solution to the affinity bindings concept
> > we are facing in the ARM world, I am posting this RFC so that hopeful
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:21:02PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in order to come up with a solid solution to the affinity bindings concept
> we are facing in the ARM world, I am posting this RFC so that hopefully people
> on the list can chime in and help us in this endeavour.
>
Hi all,
in order to come up with a solid solution to the affinity bindings concept
we are facing in the ARM world, I am posting this RFC so that hopefully people
on the list can chime in and help us in this endeavour.
I tried to keep things simple on purpose and some statements are a bit of an
ov
13 matches
Mail list logo
