On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:14:59AM +, Pratik Patel wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:58:36AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:06:43PM +, Pratik Patel wrote:
Whats the advantage in using debugfs here?
The main things I like about debugfs are (a) it's a
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:58:36AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:06:43PM +, Pratik Patel wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:32:39AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:18:28PM +, Pratik Patel wrote:
What user interface do you plan to provide
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:06:43PM +, Pratik Patel wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:32:39AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:18:28PM +, Pratik Patel wrote:
What user interface do you plan to provide for the CTI? Maybe
something consistent with other CoreSight
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:32:39AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:18:28PM +, Pratik Patel wrote:
What user interface do you plan to provide for the CTI? Maybe
something consistent with other CoreSight components in sysfs to
allow users to enable, disable, map and
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 02:00:21PM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
The code is largely based upon the existing cti helpers, which just had
a cti_map_trigger() function. The use-case you described is not
supported by the current helpers and so also not supported in my initial
implementation
On 12/21/2012 04:18 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 04:54:38PM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 12/20/2012 01:51 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:46:13AM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 12/19/2012 03:24 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
[snip]
Currently we use the
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:18:28PM +, Pratik Patel wrote:
What user interface do you plan to provide for the CTI? Maybe
something consistent with other CoreSight components in sysfs to
allow users to enable, disable, map and unmap ???
Please let me know your thoughts.
Rather than have
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 09:16:15PM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
Hi Pratik,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Pratik Patel prat...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:46:13AM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 12/19/2012 03:24 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
[snip]
Currently we use the
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:40:11PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 04:54:38PM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 12/20/2012 01:51 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
Ok, so are you referring to making CoreSight devices register
with AMBA bus instead of platform bus keeping
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 04:54:38PM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 12/20/2012 01:51 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:46:13AM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 12/19/2012 03:24 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
[snip]
Currently we use the CoreSight virtual bus to conveniently list
On 12/19/2012 03:24 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
[snip]
Currently we use the CoreSight virtual bus to conveniently list
sysfs configuration attributes for all the registered CoreSight
devices.
For eg:
/sys/bus/coresight/devices/coresight-etm0/attribute
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:46:13AM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 12/19/2012 03:24 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
[snip]
Currently we use the CoreSight virtual bus to conveniently list
sysfs configuration attributes for all the registered CoreSight
devices.
For eg:
Hi Pratik,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Pratik Patel prat...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:46:13AM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 12/19/2012 03:24 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
[snip]
Currently we use the CoreSight virtual bus to conveniently list
sysfs configuration
On 12/20/2012 01:51 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:46:13AM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 12/19/2012 03:24 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
[snip]
Currently we use the CoreSight virtual bus to conveniently list
sysfs configuration attributes for all the registered CoreSight
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 04:54:38PM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 12/20/2012 01:51 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
Ok, so are you referring to making CoreSight devices register
with AMBA bus instead of platform bus keeping everything else
intact?
Yes exactly. However, please note I am not saying
This RFC is aimed at introducing CoreSight framework as well as
individual CoreSight trace component drivers adhering to ARM
CoreSight specification. Some prior discussion on this can be
referred at [1].
There are 3 kinds of CoreSight trace components:
* Sources: Responsible for producing trace
Hi Pratik,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 07:19:17PM +, prat...@codeaurora.org wrote:
This RFC is aimed at introducing CoreSight framework as well as
individual CoreSight trace component drivers adhering to ARM
CoreSight specification. Some prior discussion on this can be
referred at [1].
On 12/19/2012 05:23 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Pratik,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 07:19:17PM +, prat...@codeaurora.org wrote:
This RFC is aimed at introducing CoreSight framework as well as
individual CoreSight trace component drivers adhering to ARM
CoreSight specification. Some prior
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:03:58AM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 12/19/2012 05:23 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Pratik,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 07:19:17PM +, prat...@codeaurora.org wrote:
This RFC is aimed at introducing CoreSight framework as well as
individual CoreSight trace
19 matches
Mail list logo
