Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Mitch Bradley
On 1/6/2012 12:55 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote: On 01/06/2012 04:05 PM, Grant Likely wrote: On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 05:53:57PM +, Jamie Iles wrote: On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:47:22AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:58

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Olof Johansson
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On 01/06/2012 04:05 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 05:53:57PM +, Jamie Iles wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:47:22AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Jamie Iles wrote: > On F

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Rob Herring
On 01/06/2012 04:05 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 05:53:57PM +, Jamie Iles wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:47:22AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Jamie Iles wrote: On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 08:28:51AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote: > On 1/6/2012 12:09 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:39:50PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm considering how to best describe the data that ramoops needs in >>> the device tree. >>> >>> The idea is re

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Mitch Bradley
On 1/6/2012 12:09 PM, Grant Likely wrote: On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:39:50PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: Hi, I'm considering how to best describe the data that ramoops needs in the device tree. The idea is really about describing a memory area that is (likely to be) nonvolatile across reboots

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:39:50PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > I'm considering how to best describe the data that ramoops needs in > the device tree. > > The idea is really about describing a memory area that is (likely to > be) nonvolatile across reboots. Said area is not to be includ

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 05:53:57PM +, Jamie Iles wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:47:22AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Jamie Iles wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 08:28:51AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > > >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Mitch Br

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Jamie Iles
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:47:22AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Jamie Iles wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 08:28:51AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote: > >> > > >> > On 1/5/2012 6:39 PM, Olof Johansson wrot

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Olof Johansson
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Jamie Iles wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 08:28:51AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote: >> > >> > On 1/5/2012 6:39 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I'm considering how to best describe the da

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Jamie Iles
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 08:28:51AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote: > > > > On 1/5/2012 6:39 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm considering how to best describe the data that ramoops needs in > >> the device tree. > >> > >> The

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Mitch Bradley
On 1/6/2012 6:33 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Rob Herring wrote: On 01/05/2012 10:39 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: Hi, I'm considering how to best describe the data that ramoops needs in the device tree. The idea is really about describing a memory area that is

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Olof Johansson
Hi, On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On 01/05/2012 10:39 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm considering how to best describe the data that ramoops needs in >> the device tree. >> >> The idea is really about describing a memory area that is (likely to >> be) nonvolatile

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Olof Johansson
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote: > > On 1/5/2012 6:39 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm considering how to best describe the data that ramoops needs in >> the device tree. >> >> The idea is really about describing a memory area that is (likely to >> be) nonvolatile

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-06 Thread Rob Herring
On 01/05/2012 10:39 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > I'm considering how to best describe the data that ramoops needs in > the device tree. > > The idea is really about describing a memory area that is (likely to > be) nonvolatile across reboots. Said area is not to be included in the > regula

Re: Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-05 Thread Mitch Bradley
On 1/5/2012 6:39 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: Hi, I'm considering how to best describe the data that ramoops needs in the device tree. The idea is really about describing a memory area that is (likely to be) nonvolatile across reboots. Said area is not to be included in the regular memory map of

Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use

2012-01-05 Thread Olof Johansson
Hi, I'm considering how to best describe the data that ramoops needs in the device tree. The idea is really about describing a memory area that is (likely to be) nonvolatile across reboots. Said area is not to be included in the regular memory map of the system (i.e. not covered by /memory). I h