RE: [PATCH] ipmi: add new kernel options to prevent automatic ipmi init

2012-12-21 Thread Evans, Robert
I have made a few observations in the past few days: 1) Unique IPMI device ID's did not seem to make a difference. Stratus still could not hot remove one of the KCS interfaces. 2) From what I see in IPMI spec section 20.1, having unique device ID's is not required: Controllers that

Re: [PATCH] ipmi: add new kernel options to prevent automatic ipmi init

2012-12-19 Thread Corey Minyard
Well, the built-in driver works on systems that have more than one interface and more than one BMC, and multiple IPMBs (and all of the other channel types for that matter, and the driver handles all the multiplexing and nasty addressing). There is, in fact, no arbitrary limit, and IBM tested

Re: [PATCH] ipmi: add new kernel options to prevent automatic ipmi init

2012-12-19 Thread Corey Minyard
On 12/14/2012 10:25 AM, Evans, Robert wrote: Corey, Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Below I respond in detail to these three points. 1) Why building a variant kernel with ipmi_si as a module is not feasible. 2) User mode access to IPMI on Stratus systems (e.g. ipmitool). 3) ipmi_si hot

Re: [PATCH] ipmi: add new kernel options to prevent automatic ipmi init

2012-12-19 Thread Tony Camuso
RHEL builds the ipmi_si into the kernel by default, rather than as a module, because it is required early in order to be available for ACPI opregion access. However, it appears that some of our customers have custom ipmi drivers, and this gets in their way. Stratus is currently evaluating your

Re: [PATCH] ipmi: add new kernel options to prevent automatic ipmi init

2012-12-19 Thread Evans, Robert
Original Message Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: add new kernel options to prevent automatic ipmi init Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:51:23 -0600 From: Corey Minyard tcminy...@gmail.com Reply-To: miny...@acm.org To: Tony Camuso tcam...@redhat.com CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org

RE: [PATCH] ipmi: add new kernel options to prevent automatic ipmi init

2012-12-19 Thread Evans, Robert
On 12/14/2012 12:02 PM, Corey Minyard wrote: On 12/14/2012 10:25 AM, Evans, Robert wrote: Corey, Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Below I respond in detail to these three points. 1) Why building a variant kernel with ipmi_si as a module is not feasible. 2) User mode access to IPMI on