with DT.
> Thanks a lot for your feedback,
>
> Lorenzo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk]
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 2:13 PM
> To: Lorenzo Pieralisi
> Cc: 'Grant Likely'; devicetree-discuss; linux-ar
t: Re: Platform data with function pointers
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:47:28PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> I think chip-select addressing should be used if that is the way HW handles
> it. If the device is described through a
memory-mapping,
> ex. snippet follo
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:47:28PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> I think chip-select addressing should be used if that is the way HW handles
> it. If the device is described through a memory-mapping,
> ex. snippet follows:
>
> ser...@101f2000 {
> compatible = "arm,pl011";
> re
Grant
Likely
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 6:32 PM
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi; devicetree-discuss;
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Jeremy Kerr; Nicolas Pitre
Subject: Re: Platform data with function pointers
[cc'ing devicetree-discuss - this conversation should be kept on-list]
Hi Lorenzo,
[cc'ing devicetree-discuss - this conversation should be kept on-list]
Hi Lorenzo,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> Sorry to bother you, we had a chat about this at UDS, but I wanted to make
> sure I am doing it the PPC way.
Well, I wouldn't call it the
