On 03/08/2013 06:38 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 08:12:20AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 03/08/2013 12:25 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:02:58PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 03/07/2013 08:11 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07,
On 03/06/2013 06:27 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Jan,
what a small world. Good to hear from you.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 12:51:21PM +0100, Jan Lübbe wrote:
Hi Sören,
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 12:04 -0800, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
For this reasons, I'd like to propose moving Zynq into the
On 03/07/2013 08:11 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:36:35AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 03/06/2013 06:27 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Jan,
what a small world. Good to hear from you.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 12:51:21PM +0100, Jan Lübbe wrote:
Hi Sören,
On
On 03/08/2013 12:25 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:02:58PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 03/07/2013 08:11 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:36:35AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 03/06/2013 06:27 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Jan,
what
Hi Sören,
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 12:04 -0800, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
For this reasons, I'd like to propose moving Zynq into the same
direction. I.e. adding a clock controller with the following DT
description (details may change but the general idea should become
clear):
clkc: clkc {