Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: dw_mmc: Handle late vmmc regulator with EPROBE_DEFER

2013-06-07 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Doug, On Thursday 06 of June 2013 21:46:45 Doug Anderson wrote: It is possible to specify a regulator that should be turned on when dw_mmc is probed. This regulator is optional, though a warning will be printed if it's missing. The fact that the regulator is optional means that (at the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: dw_mmc: Handle late vmmc regulator with EPROBE_DEFER

2013-06-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:19:58PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: On Thursday 06 of June 2013 21:46:45 Doug Anderson wrote: dw_mmc is probed. This regulator is optional, though a warning will be printed if it's missing. The fact that the regulator is optional means that (at the moment) it's

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: dw_mmc: Handle late vmmc regulator with EPROBE_DEFER

2013-06-07 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Friday 07 of June 2013 11:24:04 Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:19:58PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: On Thursday 06 of June 2013 21:46:45 Doug Anderson wrote: dw_mmc is probed. This regulator is optional, though a warning will be printed if it's missing. The fact that the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: dw_mmc: Handle late vmmc regulator with EPROBE_DEFER

2013-06-07 Thread Doug Anderson
Tomasz / Mark, On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday 07 of June 2013 11:24:04 Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:19:58PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: This interesting case makes me think that regulator core should differentiate between