Re: Generic DT binding for IPIs

2015-12-13 Thread David Gibson
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:47:57AM +, Qais Yousef wrote: > On 12/11/2015 12:39 AM, David Gibson wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:20:49AM +, Qais Yousef wrote: > >> > >>The IPIs have two properties that are different from a regular interrupts: > >> > >> 1. An IPI is not only

Re: Generic DT binding for IPIs

2015-12-10 Thread Qais Yousef
On 12/09/2015 04:50 PM, Rob Herring wrote: On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Qais Yousef wrote: What I have in mind is: coproc { ipi-parent = <>; ipis = ; ipi-names = "in"; }; This will allocate an IPI to go to cpu

Re: Generic DT binding for IPIs

2015-12-09 Thread Qais Yousef
Hi, On 10/22/2015 12:55 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote: Is there anything more I can do to get more attention about this? I think Marc's suggestion is more generic and future proof, if I send RFC patches for that would this be better?

Re: Generic DT binding for IPIs

2015-12-09 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Qais Yousef wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/22/2015 12:55 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote: >>> >>> Is there anything more I can do to get more attention about this? I >>> think Marc's