On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:47:57AM +, Qais Yousef wrote:
> On 12/11/2015 12:39 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:20:49AM +, Qais Yousef wrote:
> >>
> >>The IPIs have two properties that are different from a regular interrupts:
> >>
> >> 1. An IPI is not only
On 12/09/2015 04:50 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Qais Yousef wrote:
What I have in mind is:
coproc {
ipi-parent = <>;
ipis = ;
ipi-names = "in";
};
This will allocate an IPI to go to cpu
Hi,
On 10/22/2015 12:55 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
Is there anything more I can do to get more attention about this? I
think Marc's suggestion is more generic and future proof, if I send
RFC patches for that would this be better?
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Qais Yousef wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/22/2015 12:55 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there anything more I can do to get more attention about this? I
>>> think Marc's