It appears the delegate mail server function only works if the SME server is
in server-gateway mode. Testing has been done on SME5.1B3 only.
I have a scenario whereby a client wants to use an SME server for one sole
dedicated purpose. To act as a mailrelay/virus scanning server to their
Exchan
Any plans to provide support for Internet connection rate-limiting on a
per service or per user basis?
Failing that, does anyone have any ideas on how one might cleanly
configure rate limiting on an E-Smith v4.12 or SME 5.0 box?
Traffic stats on Internet & LAN services (ala MRTG) would be very n
At 17:11 19/12/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Is this an SMP capable machine?
>
>If so, this should go away with the next reboot - it's a chicken&egg
>problem with the installer running the non-SMP kernel.
Yes. it is, and, as one rarely needs to reboot a Linux box, I hadn't
noticed that
Thank
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:34:43AM -0800, Des Dougan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> I wanted to confirm if this was expected behaviour ("not supported by
> kernel"). If there is no USB support, why does it try to start these up?
> Because they're identified by the BIOS?
Is this an SMP cap
Well the idea was also to log these ports/alert someone deny all, then
allow what you want is the best way to get security. However in this case
we are talking inside to out and opposed to letting the outside in.
As such I see security as less of an issue in the traditional sense. What
you
I saw this with the first beta, and didn't get round to asking. On reboot
after applying the upgrade, I noticed two USB services failing:
Dec 19 11:09:56 agatha rc.sysinit: Setting hostname agatha: succeeded
Dec 19 11:09:56 agatha mount: mount: fs type usbdevfs not supported by kernel
Dec 19 11
Thanks Rob,
look at this:
Deleting:Alexa,1,HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE,2,software\microsoft\internet
explorer\extensions\{c95fe080-8f5d-11d2-a20b-00aa003c157a},,
> Try putting Ad-Aware on your server and running it..
>
> http://www.lurkhere.com/~nicefiles/index.html look for As-Aware 5.62 and
> the si
Can I put forward an additional fragment for squid?
It's an ideal addon for transproxy, but it's main feature is if you have
slow parent proxies, that force your machine to go direct *all* the time,
even when the hierarchy is tweaked.
Some people may not like it though, as direct can sometimes b
Why not remove the default IPMASQ rule, forcing all internal machines to
go through the relevant servers? Eg mail & squid (maybe use transproxy),
and it blocks any other services internal to your network, and stops
machines' programs *not* setup to use your mail & squid services from
being able to
Its one thing to trap mail to a known destination like the problem Kees
was having but to stop mail being sent from a machine that is allowed to
send mail, how would this work? One way is to put a STOP button on the
SME mail server, you go to a web page, log in and hit the mail sending
"STOP"/"STA
G'Day All,
I did have a development idea a few weeks back that was triggered by
something else and this seems similar.
Sircam and similar was my trigger. And any virus/Trojan that can act as
self sufficient server and send out sensitive company documents or similar.
Could we develop an SME "De
Why not usr bash, chroot, and the required program to give minimal, almost
non-existant access outside of their login purpose?
Regards,
Craig Foster
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 9:44 AM
> To: e-smith-devinfo
> Su
Hi everybody,
I have decided to turn the offending item into YAMS ( yet another Mitel box
.. YAMS sounds better then YAES.. ).
That's it's punishment for annoying me.
Building a backup box as I speak to dump to contents of the server to, and
then, no more dialing home, ever!
kees
--
Please
13 matches
Mail list logo
