> I doubt there is a single "correct way".
Charlie,
Many thanks for the very detailed response to my question. Things are much
clearer now. :)
Greg
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers an
> I doubt there is a single "correct way".
Charlie,
Many thanks for the very detailed response to my question. Things are much
clearer now. :)
Greg
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers an
> I doubt there is a single "correct way".
Charlie,
Many thanks for the very detailed response to my question. Things are much
clearer now. :)
Greg
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers an
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Greg Zartman wrote:
> What is the correct way to start a supervised service from within an
> RPM?
I doubt there is a single "correct way".
> For example: I create an rpm that installs a new service and then
> want to start said service. Is this done in the %POST script
that you can run it over and over again. A default value will only be set
if it isn't set already, and a force value wins all the time - so
repeating the process is harmless.
Very good. Thanks Charlie. I was afraid that running this on a
modified dbase would return it to the defaults -- very b
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Greg Zartman wrote:
> Is it possible to initialize a single dbase with this new mechanism?
> It appears that one must initialize all of them at once, given the
If you dig down deep enough in the library code you'll find a way to do
just one db. But why bother? The db init
Is it possible to initialize a single dbase with this new mechanism?
It appears that one must initialize all of them at once, given the
available sme action scripts.
Thank you.
Greg Zartman
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issu
Hi Justin,
Try visiting www.tech-geeks.org and signing up for two of their mailing
lists: 'tech-geeks' and 'e-smith'. There are dozens of experienced
e-smith/SME admins on them.
These lists are very friendly; you can ask whatever you want and people
will be glad to help you.
Hope to see you
>From what I remember I subscribed to this list mainly because I didn't see
a list to ask a question about installation problems. I have posted to
the forums at contribs.org without any response, so I was hoping that I
could get an idea somewhere else.
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECT
I agree...I switched to cc 2.1 office a month ago and absolutely love it.
Richard
Last night I made a comment about Clark Connect 2.0, I'd not used or got
under the bonnet of 2.1. 2.1 is a benchmark on usability, clarity of
coding, installation design and service configuration that SME can aim
for.
If you've not played with 2.1 I suggest you make time to do so.
It's brilli
> Are you new to the list?
>
Not really, but AFAIK you never published any rpms. I needed powerswitch
for a customer, so I decided to compile the module myself and make it
also avcailable to the community. It works on my Intel Celeron and AMD
Athlon single processor systems (SME 6), so I suppose
- Original Message -
From: "Michiel Blotwijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 1:42 AM
Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] Powerswitch for SME
> Hi,
>
> I compiled and repackaged Joris van Rantwijk's powerswitch module for
> the SME server. From Joris
13 matches
Mail list logo
