On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Charlie Brady wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I did something wrong on install? Is it because as it is it is secure
> > enough?
>
> We hope that it is secure enough. But we do want and intend to offer
> greater assurance than that.
>
> > S
Dear developers,
I have a fairly basic question which I'm sure has been answered before.
Why does e-smith not include a good set of ipchains rules? Or does it and
I did something wrong on install? Is it because as it is it is secure
enough? Surely it would be nice to drop and and allow package
Regarding e-smith security;
I have had an e-smith box up and running for about 1/2 a year with NOTHING
other than what is installed and configured by default. On a cable modem.
Uptime: 153 days. Breakins: 0 Attempted Breakins: many
So in my situation e-smith is secure be default. Of course tha
Greetings,
I am currently running E-smith 4.0. Now in my attempt to read up onm
security etc. it is frequently recomended that one logs all logs on a
different machine as well as the primary so that if the main box is
compromised the log box'll be ok (all services shut off etc). Is this
going to
