On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> > I know e-smith are looking at djbdns for future releases, but as bind9
> > is supposed to be a drop-in replacement for bind8, maybe it is worth
> > looking at updating both.
>
> Emphasis on "supposed to be" :-) BIND9 is definitely pickier about config
> file syntax - I don't think we should have issues with the syntax of
> our BIND files, but BIND9 may pick us up on something.
I have a vague recollection that I tried the update once, and bind
wouldn't start up because it didn't like something in the config file. I
didn't investigate further - but that is enough to falsify the "drop-in
replacement" theory.
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lead Product Developer
Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com/
Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com/
Phone: +1 (613) 368 4376 or 564 8000 Fax: +1 (613) 564 7739
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
