On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:25:55PM -0500, Dean Staff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2001, at 12:19, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> > [...]
> > rpm -e --nodeps obtuse-smtpd
> >
> > rpm -ivh obtuse-smtpd-2.0-21.i386.rpm
> > [...]
And...
/sbin/e-smith/signal-event console-save
to ensure that the
On 22 Jan 2001, at 12:40, Dean Staff wrote:
>
>
> On 22 Jan 2001, at 12:37, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:25:55PM -0500, Dean Staff
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 22 Jan 2001, at 12:19, Gordon Rowell
> > wrote: > > [...] > > rpm -e --nodeps obtuse-smtpd > > > > rpm
On 22 Jan 2001, at 13:59, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:58:40PM -0500, Dean Staff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote: > On 22 Jan 2001, at 12:40, Dean Staff wrote: > [...] > I just
> pushed through 2 sets of messages, one was 261 message, and > the
> second was 886 messages, and th
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> RPM bizarreness on upgrades with RPMs containing %postun sections -
> the %postun of the upgraded package gets run after the new package is
> installed, so you still lose the symlinks :-(
There is a workaround in many RPMs - guard the %postun action w
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:58:40PM -0500, Dean Staff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2001, at 12:40, Dean Staff wrote:
> [...]
> I just pushed through 2 sets of messages, one was 261 message, and
> the second was 886 messages, and the mail server didn't even slow-
> down.
Excellent.
> My
On 22 Jan 2001, at 12:37, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:25:55PM -0500, Dean Staff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote: > On 22 Jan 2001, at 12:19, Gordon Rowell wrote: > > [...] > >
> rpm -e --nodeps obtuse-smtpd > > > > rpm -ivh
> obtuse-smtpd-2.0-21.i386.rpm > > [...]
>
> And...
