Damien Curtain [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And thats going well...
At least they tried. No one else has done better.
Im not sure how in touch people here are with kernel development,
because
I wouldnt be rushing to stick the latest and greatest 2.4 kernel on any
machine other than crash and
Damien Curtain [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And thats going well...
At least they tried. No one else has done better.
What has happened to axonlinux?
--
Regards
Brandon Friedman
Product Manager
Tech-Knowledgy Advantage
Ph: +27 (011) 486-0626
Fax: +27 (011) 486-0629
Cell: +27 (083) 408-7840
: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:44 AM
To: Devinfo@E-Smith. Org
Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SME on top of a distro [was Re:
[e-smith-devinfo] krud? + X]
Anecdotal Evidence (tm) says that the RedHat 2.4.9 (includes patches) is
the most reliable. (ie less panics _and_ page faults)
I think
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Brandon Friedman wrote:
Damien Curtain [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And thats going well...
At least they tried. No one else has done better.
What has happened to axonlinux?
Disappeared without a trace.
--
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lead
stephen noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
would you like to remind us briefly how difficult it
would be to place SME on top of a redhat distro
If we take axonlinux as a project that has travelled this path already,
they built a new distro iso. To be very brief they essentially took a
disto
