RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: OT [e-smith-devinfo] Using e-smith 4.1 Beta with a browser.

2001-04-25 Thread Michael Jung
> Great - that seems to fit in well. Have you tried the PPPoE support in > 4.1b2 with T-Online? The PPPoE account and password dialogues don't > validate the strings in any way, but the templates quote them for the > PPPoE configuration. > Gordon Not yet, but is planned for the days past christma

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: OT [e-smith-devinfo] Using e-smith 4.1 Beta with a browser.

2001-04-25 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:21:47PM +0100, Michael Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The format of the username for the T-Online DSL connection is: > #[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > n, m is given by T-Online, 001 can also be 002 for a subuser account the > rest is fixed. Great - th

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: OT [e-smith-devinfo] Using e-smith 4.1 Beta with a browser.

2001-04-25 Thread Michael Jung
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 3:42 AM > To: Gordon Rowell > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: OT [e-smith-devinfo] Using e-smith 4.1 > Beta with a browser. > > > Zitiere Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Are t

Re: OT [e-smith-devinfo] Using e-smith 4.1 Beta with a browser.

2001-04-25 Thread Michael Weinberger
Zitiere Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Are the username/password for PPPoE screens worded clearly > enough? Yes. > Do you need username@carrier in N.Z., or just username? Both > carriers > in Ottawa use username@carrier. > > Anyone in other regions able to comment? Gordon, here in Germa