]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] The Anomy Sanitizer
: In any case, you shouldn't need the qmailqueue patch as the
: equivalent is already available in mailfront (which covers
: mail injected via SMTP - the only way a user can inject mail
OK,
after a bit of hunting around and stuff, I found out how to patch qmail:
patch /path/to/patch/qmailqueue.patch
but I am still confused on do I need to remove the headers from the patch,
as is it looks just like a normal email, or will patch just ignore it?
Also after I patch it, then the
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:49:52AM +1000, Cyrus Bharda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK,
after a bit of hunting around and stuff, I found out how to patch qmail:
patch /path/to/patch/qmailqueue.patch
but I am still confused on do I need to remove the headers from the patch,
as is it looks
In any case, you shouldn't need the qmailqueue patch as the
equivalent is already available in mailfront (which covers
mail injected via SMTP - the only way a user can inject mail
in an unmodified SME Server).
I believe you are looking for something like this:
/sbin/e-smith/config setprop
