On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Dario Freddi wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 December 2009 16:36:04 Tobias Arrskog wrote:
> > Sure I agree, I just made it quick (more as a proof of concept for a
> patch
> > I was working on).
>
> So I assume you'll be/are working this already (just to avoid duplicating
>
On Dec 8, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Tobias Arrskog
wrote:
To bring more to the discsussion regarding uses of events at both
wakeup and suspends.
On suspend apps can close sockets and signal disconnects properly to
servers (even if the server in itself probably should handle a wrong
disconnect
On Tuesday 08 December 2009 16:36:04 Tobias Arrskog wrote:
> Sure I agree, I just made it quick (more as a proof of concept for a patch
> I was working on).
So I assume you'll be/are working this already (just to avoid duplicating
efforts)
>
> But glad to see that there is more than me that ne
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 09:34 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> 2009/12/8 Jedy Wang :
> > 1) When will the renaming happen, in one week, one month, before
> > gnome-2-30's release or after?
>
> I'm not sure. I'm tempted to push the upower code into a new git repo,
> for clarity.
FWIW, I'm planning to
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> 2009/12/8 Dario Freddi :
>> The Awakening signal instead would be more useful and less dangerous. Let's
>> say that, in the end, the best solution for everyone could possibly be just
>> adding the Awakening signal.
>
> Fine for me. If somebod
To bring more to the discsussion regarding uses of events at both wakeup and
suspends.
On suspend apps can close sockets and signal disconnects properly to servers
(even if the server in itself probably should handle a wrong disconnect it's
nice to support it nicely).
On resume sockets could get
Sure I agree, I just made it quick (more as a proof of concept for a patch I
was working on).
But glad to see that there is more than me that needs it atleast :D
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> 2009/12/8 Tobias Arrskog :
> > I posted a patch a few weeks ago, It might hav
2009/12/8 Tobias Arrskog :
> I posted a patch a few weeks ago, It might have been overlocked or just
> uggly :)
> Basically it did a dbus-event from pm-utils.
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/2009-November/000527.html
No, you need to define the signal in the DeviceKit-power int
I posted a patch a few weeks ago, It might have been overlocked or just
uggly :)
Basically it did a dbus-event from pm-utils.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/2009-November/000527.html
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> 2009/12/8 Dario Freddi :
> > The Aw
2009/12/8 Dario Freddi :
> The Awakening signal instead would be more useful and less dangerous. Let's
> say that, in the end, the best solution for everyone could possibly be just
> adding the Awakening signal.
Fine for me. If somebody has a few minutes, I would love a patch to
upower that adds a
On Tuesday 08 December 2009 15:51:02 Richard Hughes wrote:
> 2009/12/8 Dario Freddi :
> > But I think a better idea would be having the signal being streamed from
> > upower (since if the aim is providing an unique and future-proof system),
> > triggered from an hook in pm-utils. I think such a sol
2009/12/8 Dario Freddi :
> But I think a better idea would be having the signal being streamed from
> upower (since if the aim is providing an unique and future-proof system),
> triggered from an hook in pm-utils. I think such a solution would be the best
> of both worlds.
You have to be careful w
On Tuesday 08 December 2009 15:32:52 you wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:12 +0100, Dario Freddi wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 December 2009 14:55:42 Anders Lund wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to request a DBus signal notifying interrested parties
> > > about system suspend/hibernate/resume
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:12 +0100, Dario Freddi wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 December 2009 14:55:42 Anders Lund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to request a DBus signal notifying interrested parties about
> > system suspend/hibernate/resume events.
>
> I second his request (I'm the maintainer of th
On Tuesday 08 December 2009 14:55:42 Anders Lund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to request a DBus signal notifying interrested parties about
> system suspend/hibernate/resume events.
I second his request (I'm the maintainer of the power management KDE daemon).
Just clarifying, we're interested in
2009/12/8 Jedy Wang :
> 1) When will the renaming happen, in one week, one month, before
> gnome-2-30's release or after?
I'm not sure. I'm tempted to push the upower code into a new git repo,
for clarity.
> 2) What level of ABI stability will upower/udisks provide?
For me personally, I think th
16 matches
Mail list logo
