On 01/18/2010 04:29 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> 2010/1/18 Ali Abdallah:
>
>> But we didn't have any release yet, so for me that's fine, i can provide a
>> configure switch of the bus name if nothing else is going to be dramatically
>> changed
>> in the daemon itself.
>>
> Sure, just the
No problem for XBMC, I abstracted it when hal got deprecated so it will be
easy to add a runtime check for upower
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> 2010/1/18 Tobias Arrskog :
> > XBMC (xbmc.org) does use it directly.
>
> Would it be okay for xbmc to look for the dbus servi
2010/1/18 Ali Abdallah :
> But we didn't have any release yet, so for me that's fine, i can provide a
> configure switch of the bus name if nothing else is going to be dramatically
> changed
> in the daemon itself.
Sure, just the dbus interface and service names will change.
Thanks,
Richard.
__
In Xfpm (Xfce's power manager) we decided to use the daemon directly,
despite that
i asked you to make the devkit-power-gobject library public to be able
to use it.
But we didn't have any release yet, so for me that's fine, i can provide
a configure
switch of the bus name if nothing else is goi
2010/1/18 Tobias Arrskog :
> XBMC (xbmc.org) does use it directly.
Would it be okay for xbmc to look for the dbus service
org.freedesktop.UPower as well, perhaps at runtime?
Richard.
___
devkit-devel mailing list
devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http:
XBMC (xbmc.org) does use it directly.
(sorry richard, I accidently hit reply instead of reply to all)
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> This morning I've spent an hour or so renaming internal classes and
> most of the filenames we use internally.
>
> I'm planning to renam
This morning I've spent an hour or so renaming internal classes and
most of the filenames we use internally.
I'm planning to rename the org.freedesktop.DeviceKit.Power service
soon ready for the upower rename. I'm intending to keep the
devkit-power-gobject library API and ABI stable at least for a
