Re: Re-unifying udisks and storaged

2016-11-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Vratislav, Vratislav Podzimek [2016-11-28 16:04 +0100]: > > * storaged PRs do run some tests, but unfortunately the result links > >don't work at all so I don't know what they actually test. I would > >hope that at least build + src/tests/integration-test? If not, > >that's some

Re: Re-unifying udisks and storaged

2016-11-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Tomáš Smetana [2016-11-28 14:09 +0100]: > One thing we miss at the moment is some good communication channel. Github > does not have mailing lists and since storaged is not a Freedesktop project > we didn't feel like discussing our stuff here. Perhaps this ML list would be > a good place to discuss

Re: Re-unifying udisks and storaged

2016-11-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Simon McVittie [2016-11-28 14:16 +]: > If the maintainers of udisks2 are happy with doing so, I would > advocate using the udisks[2] name FTR: I'm the closest thing to a maintainer right now (and I'm doing a really bad job at it), and I'm happy with it :) Martin -- Martin Pitt

Re: Re-unifying udisks and storaged

2016-11-28 Thread Vratislav Podzimek
On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 15:32 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello storaged and udisks developers, > > I spent some time on udisks life support today: mopping up some > patches in bugzilla, fix failure with latest glib, and the like. Much > of that affects storaged too (e. g. the glib test failure). Bu

Re: Re-unifying udisks and storaged

2016-11-28 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 at 14:09:06 +0100, Tomáš Smetana wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:32:22 +0100 > Martin Pitt wrote: > > My instinct tells me that the hardest part of this will (as usually) > > be the naming: udisks or storaged. Quite a lot of upstream and > > third-party software builds/links ag

Re: Re-unifying udisks and storaged

2016-11-28 Thread Tomáš Smetana
Hello everyone. This is definitely a great news for us. We will flesh out the details I suppose. I'll try to clarify some of your points for the start. I guess I'm guilty of many of the storaged odd decisions... On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:32:22 +0100 Martin Pitt wrote: <...> > * Personally I woul