Re: Re-unifying udisks and storaged

2016-12-02 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 at 15:23:19 +0100, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: > (e.g. byte arrays instead of strings, everything synchronous,...) There is probably a reason for these design decisions. Think carefully before breaking them. Byte arrays on D-Bus, in places where you expect a string, usually mean

Re: Re-unifying udisks and storaged

2016-12-02 Thread Vratislav Podzimek
On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 15:23 +0100, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: > Hello again, everyone! > > Let me use this opportunity of a general quiet in this thread to try to push > it further a bit. I believe we have all agreed on the direction we > would > like to go with the udisks2 and storaged projects.

Re: Re-unifying udisks and storaged

2016-12-02 Thread Vratislav Podzimek
Hello again, everyone! Let me use this opportunity of a general quiet in this thread to try to push it further a bit. I believe we have all agreed on the direction we would like to go with the udisks2 and storaged projects. That being the reunification of the projects using the current storaged