Re: Automated LUKS Unlocking

2016-03-19 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 00:02 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 16:59 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > > > > Sorry for the cross-post! However, I figured it was the best way to > > reach all the right people. > > > > I'm the author of the Tang[1] project. In a nutshell, Tang pr

Re: Automated LUKS Unlocking

2016-03-18 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 17:51 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 00:02 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 16:59 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sorry for the cross-post! However, I figured it was the best way > > > to > > > reach all

Re: Automated LUKS Unlocking

2016-03-15 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 16:59 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > Sorry for the cross-post! However, I figured it was the best way to > reach all the right people. > > I'm the author of the Tang[1] project. In a nutshell, Tang provides a > way to bind an encrypted disk to a network. We currently prov

Automated LUKS Unlocking

2016-03-15 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
Sorry for the cross-post! However, I figured it was the best way to reach all the right people. I'm the author of the Tang[1] project. In a nutshell, Tang provides a way to bind an encrypted disk to a network. We currently provide automated unlocking of the root volume (via initramfs/systemd). Ho