Re: VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2018-02-20 Thread segfault
Hi, segfault: > We are currently working on the patches for the unlock dialog in Disks. > This will probably be finished soon. The resulting UI is much more > complex than in the LUKS case, but this simply reflects the more complex > needs of VeraCrypt users. the Disks patches are ready now, they

Re: [Tails-dev] VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2018-02-11 Thread segfault
Hi, segfault: > Hi, > > we at Tails (tails.boum.org) currently work on integrating support for > unlocking VeraCrypt (and probably also TrueCrypt) volumes in Tails via > udisks2 and GNOME Disks (and maybe also GNOME Files and the GVfs > monitor). We internally track the status of this work in [1]

Re: VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-15 Thread segfault
.. ink ..: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:02 PM, segfault wrote: > > >> We do not plan to support creating new TC/VC containers, and I didn't >> even know that zulucrypt can do this (thanks for the hint!). I find the >> idea tempting, maybe I will work on that at some point. >> > > zuluCrypt[0] u

Re: VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-14 Thread Vratislav Podzimek
On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 20:05 +0100, segfault wrote: > Vratislav Podzimek: > > On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 17:36 +0100, segfault wrote: > > [...] > > > I forgot to add: Assuming that you would like to have this in upstream, > > > some heads up for when it would be ideal for us if an upstream > > > maintain

Re: VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-14 Thread segfault
Vratislav Podzimek: > On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 17:36 +0900, Kai Lüke wrote: > [...] >> * GNOME Disks and GIO/GVFs need to make use of the keyfiles parameter in >> UDisks (currently lacking for LUKS as well) and a way to select a >> keyfile from GNOME Shell is needed. One could also decide to explicitl

Re: VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-14 Thread segfault
Vratislav Podzimek: > On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 17:36 +0100, segfault wrote: > [...] >> I forgot to add: Assuming that you would like to have this in upstream, >> some heads up for when it would be ideal for us if an upstream >> maintainer was available for reviewing: >> - We will evaluate the results

Re: VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-14 Thread segfault
Hi, thanks for the quick reply! I re-add the tails-dev mailinglist to Cc. Kai Lüke: > Seems I misunderstood while reading, so you already have code. Correct. Sorry if I didn't make that clear enough. I will still answer your previous email below. In case you already want to have a look at the cu

Re: VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-14 Thread Vratislav Podzimek
On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 17:36 +0900, Kai Lüke wrote: > Hello, > > of course there is more than one way to do it, but this is how I quickly > thought about this: > > * use the cryptsetup support for locking/unlocking in libblockdev and > make it work from the UDisks2.Encrypted interface > * add the

Re: VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-14 Thread Vratislav Podzimek
On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 17:36 +0100, segfault wrote: > segfault: > > Hi, > > > > we at Tails (tails.boum.org) currently work on integrating support for > > unlocking VeraCrypt (and probably also TrueCrypt) volumes in Tails via > > udisks2 and GNOME Disks (and maybe also GNOME Files and the GVfs > >

Re: VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-14 Thread Kai Lüke
Seems I misunderstood while reading, so you already have code. If your way of identifying encrypted partitions works good enough (which is funny because the partition is not really hidden then) you can ignore my sentences on presenting those device contents. From the GNOME Disks point of view it wo

Re: VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-14 Thread Kai Lüke
Hello, of course there is more than one way to do it, but this is how I quickly thought about this: * use the cryptsetup support for locking/unlocking in libblockdev and make it work from the UDisks2.Encrypted interface * add the UDisks2.Encrypted interface in UDisks if the block device content c

Re: VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-13 Thread segfault
Hey, thanks for the quick response! Bastien Nocera: > [...] > What UI differences would be needed to handle those different types of > encryption? I'm guessing none for handling encrypted disks, because the > UI should be pretty much the same as for the existing LVM based > encryption support. D

Re: VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-13 Thread Bastien Nocera
Hey, On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 17:19 +0100, segfault wrote: > Hi, > > we at Tails (tails.boum.org) currently work on integrating support > for > unlocking VeraCrypt (and probably also TrueCrypt) volumes in Tails > via > udisks2 and GNOME Disks (and maybe also GNOME Files and the GVfs > monitor). We i

Re: VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-13 Thread segfault
segfault: > Hi, > > we at Tails (tails.boum.org) currently work on integrating support for > unlocking VeraCrypt (and probably also TrueCrypt) volumes in Tails via > udisks2 and GNOME Disks (and maybe also GNOME Files and the GVfs > monitor). We internally track the status of this work in [1] and

VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt support in GNOME Disks

2017-11-13 Thread segfault
Hi, we at Tails (tails.boum.org) currently work on integrating support for unlocking VeraCrypt (and probably also TrueCrypt) volumes in Tails via udisks2 and GNOME Disks (and maybe also GNOME Files and the GVfs monitor). We internally track the status of this work in [1] and [2]. Currently we are