> Ah, nice. Do you think you will also implement that other parameter I asked
> for (number of misses tolerated)?
Not tonight, but in the next version. Tonight I have commited
apparently fully working versions of IndexClient and KeyIndexClient which
have a -start parameter and -useDate parameter
- Original Message -
From: "Brandon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm sorry about this. I implemented a switch (-useDate yes/no) which
> allows you to read old indexes, but I didn't think to hold the 0.3.9
> release until I finished it. If you use the CVS version then you can read
> both kinds of
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:58:43AM -0700, Mr.Bad wrote:
> Can we please, PLEASE turn on the bug-tracking system on Sourceforge?
> Or at least set up some kind of Bugzilla or something on hawk, maybe
> (if it could take it)?
>
> I'd be quite happy to muddle through the bugs on SourceForge if
> some
Okay, this is now fixed.
It was introduced by someone when the code to redirect '?key=' to '/key' went
in. The url must be re-encoded.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:05:46PM +0100, toad wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 06:49:01PM -0700, Dev Random wrote:
> > I saw this reported before, but I haven'
Yes, for several hours already.
Jantho
http://home.t-online.de/home/jantho_/
http://127.0.0.1:8081/MSK at SSK@MybRxkESI3p98XfweJzz3-VRZZIQAgE/Frost//
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
> [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Mr.Bad
> Sent: Thu
> 1) How do you rate the prospect of you keeping it protocol-compatible with
> the official Java Freenet as it evolves from version to version?
Since it's based on libfreenet, a lot of its upkeep will be taken care of
by updating libfreenet. That's the beauty of a modular library.
So the only t
> I'm working with the folks at GLUG (http://www.glug.org/) to set up
> GUMM (Guile's answer to CPAN). They want to have the mirroring work
> through Freenet.
I just said to someone the other day that the problem with Guile is that
it likes CPAN. It's also very important to me personally that th
> Right. I've written a deeply hackerware experimental freenet node
> implementation (in C) -- currently it can connect to the 'testserver'
> program in Steven Hazel's libfreenet successfully.
That's awesome! I'd really like a C node.
___
Devl maili
Cool, thanks Mark, Tavin; that fixed it.
On Thursday 26 April 2001 07:55 pm, you wrote:
> Yes, hrm, this is kind of an up in the air issue atm, but it will
> work if you send the bytes 00 00 00 02 at the beginning of the connection.
> This *is* documented in the spec, under http://freenetproject
> Well, 0.3.9 is not officially "out" yet. I'm still trying to patch
> other bugs, so get it in before tomorrow and we'll deal.
Yay! I love this pre-release thing! So I've commited a client that works
with both date-based and non-date-based and I fixed the XML-RPC port
number generation in Setup
Hello,
I'm responding to the invitation for translators. (Found on:
http://freenet.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=translations )
I could make a Dutch translation for some parts of the Freenet website or
the program.
I'm a Dutch student in computer science and information technology in The
Netherla
From: "Kalle A. Sandstr"om" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Right. I've written a deeply hackerware experimental freenet node
>implementation (in C) -- currently it can connect to the 'testserver'
Two questions:
1) How do you rate the prospect of you keeping it protocol-compatible with
the official Java
Yes, hrm, this is kind of an up in the air issue atm, but it will
work if you send the bytes 00 00 00 02 at the beginning of the connection.
This *is* documented in the spec, under http://freenetproject.org/doc/
So this 0.3.9 will actually be the first release in which FCPHandler
fully matches th
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Rob Cakebread wrote:
> java.io.IOException: bad session/presentation ID
That's because you now have to send four bytes -- 00 00 00 02 -- to start
a FCP session. fwrite("\0\0\0\2", 4, 1, sock); will do.
--
"...you have mistaken your cowardice for common sense
and have fou
Right. I've written a deeply hackerware experimental freenet node
implementation (in C) -- currently it can connect to the 'testserver'
program in Steven Hazel's libfreenet successfully. (I haven't tested the
encrypted transport against Fred yet since my node is dropping connections
right after
Thanks for the info on the new in-Freenet index everybody.
Did FCP change in 0.3.9 too? When doing a test from my own code
and Mark's test C client, I get:
java.io.IOException: bad session/presentation ID
at Freenet.contrib.fcp.FCPHandler.service(FCPHandler.java)
at
Freenet.c
> "KAS" == Kalle A Sandstr\"om writes:
KAS> Where exactly is the LISP in Freenet? Sure, there's quite a
KAS> bit of Python code in the contrib/ dir, but LISP? Which
KAS> dialect? What for?
Guile, in the XML-RPC section. There's a Guile binding to the XML-RPC
interface so you
> "B" == Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
B> I'm sorry about this. I implemented a switch (-useDate yes/no)
B> which allows you to read old indexes, but I didn't think to
B> hold the 0.3.9 release until I finished it. If you use the CVS
B> version then you can read both ki
Yeh, I used to experience it, then one day it magically went away. Sometimes
the weird white window 'appears' very briefly and then 'disappears' again.
Haven't tried the 0.3.9 yet though.
I fixed it in my C port of freenet.exe along with the decidedly dodgy
practice of calling DestroyWindow() call
- If somebody has access to the physical connection between you and
Freenet, they can both evesdrop and effect your traffic. Even if they
cannot change the data, they can still most probably get a good idea of
what you are doing.
- The addresses of nodes propogate around the network, so if you ru
> When I try to list an index with the (pre) 0.3.9 release, old indexes don't
> work.
I'm sorry about this. I implemented a switch (-useDate yes/no) which
allows you to read old indexes, but I didn't think to hold the 0.3.9
release until I finished it. If you use the CVS version then you can rea
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:58:53PM -0700, cardhore wrote:
> Heh heh. I just ran David Wheeler's program SLOCCount
> on the newest release (0.3.9) and it produced some
> cool statistics. 54625 lines of code and an estimated
> development effort in person-years of 13.34! The code
> is 83.90% jav
> "It's no good for FreeNet, next to no use for MojoNation or Gnutella,
> and no good for SETI at home,"
The article's valled "No Joy from P2P vets for Sun's JXTA". Yep, that's
about how I would describe my feelings on JXTA.
___
Devl mailing list
Dev
From: "thelema"
> MSKs (which don't exist anymore, but the concept of which exists in the
current metadata spec).
Huh??!?
Is this true?
Are MSKs being dropped from Freenet??
What about all the MSK-based sites?
If MSKs are headed for the bit-bucket, are they to be replaced with
anything??
Cheers
Heh heh. I just ran David Wheeler's program SLOCCount
on the newest release (0.3.9) and it produced some
cool statistics. 54625 lines of code and an estimated
development effort in person-years of 13.34! The code
is 83.90% java, 11.56% python, 2.01% C, 1.58% perl,
0.68% sh, and 0.27% lisp. The
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:58:43AM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote:
> Can we please, PLEASE turn on the bug-tracking system on Sourceforge?
> Or at least set up some kind of Bugzilla or something on hawk, maybe
> (if it could take it)?
>
> I'd be quite happy to muddle through the bugs on SourceForge if
> som
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:45:16AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:56:53AM -0700, Mr . Bad wrote:
> > Why is that? The code hasn't been worked on since it was originally
> > released, and all the same problems exist with it. It doesn't seem
> > like anything has changed since
Heh heh. I just ran David Wheeler's program SLOCCount
on the newest release (0.3.9) and it produced some
cool statistics. 54625 lines of code and an estimated
development effort in person-years of 13.34! The code
is 83.90% java, 11.56% python, 2.01% C, 1.58% perl,
0.68% sh, and 0.27% lisp. The
> When I try to list an index with the (pre) 0.3.9 release, old indexes don't
> work.
I'm sorry about this. I implemented a switch (-useDate yes/no) which
allows you to read old indexes, but I didn't think to hold the 0.3.9
release until I finished it. If you use the CVS version then you can re
> "It's no good for FreeNet, next to no use for MojoNation or Gnutella,
> and no good for SETI at home,"
The article's valled "No Joy from P2P vets for Sun's JXTA". Yep, that's
about how I would describe my feelings on JXTA.
___
Devl mailing list
[E
See Latest Indonesia Japan News at;
http://suratkabar.com
http://suratkabar.co.uk
http://suratkabar.web.id
Looking to you there!
___
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
>From - Thu Apr 26 1
> > I'd be quite happy to muddle through the bugs on SourceForge if
> > someone would flip my bug-db admin bit there.
I do occasionally go in there and delete old fixed or obsolete bug
reports.
BTW, someone should fix the web page so that it mentions the new release.
_
But it's not just a case of creating the icon. You also need to set up a
hook for the mouse events (ok, so it's just a defined constant in the
WM_USER range), create a popup menu for the icon, handle the additional
WM_COMMAND and WM_USER events, ... I think the point Owen was trying to
make was
That's a feature - indexes are date based in 0.3.9. This is meant to keep
indices from growing infinitely over time.
Unfortunately there's no way to request a "legacy" non-date based index via
KeyIndexClient anymore. What you can do of course is request it manually:
frequest snarfoo-0
fr
Hi,
When I try to list an index with the (pre) 0.3.9 release, old indexes don't
work.
Are the old indexes nuked as of 0.3.9 or is this a bug?
After trying to insert, I can see that there is another set of numbers before
the incremented index.
java Freenet.client.KeyIndexClient -insert sna
Hi,
When I try to list an index with the (pre) 0.3.9 release, old indexes don't
work.
Are the old indexes nuked as of 0.3.9 or is this a bug?
After trying to insert, I can see that there is another set of numbers before
the incremented index.
java Freenet.client.KeyIndexClient -insert sn
> services.xmlrpc.port=8082
That's supposed to be 6690.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
>From - Thu Apr 26 20:28:49 2001
Return-Path:
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postf
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010426/2e728d28/attachment.pgp>
"It's no good for FreeNet, next to no use for MojoNation or Gnutella,
and no good for SETI at home,"
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/18519.html
Adam shows us how to make large corporate enemies before reaching the
age of 18.
Ian.
PGP signature
> > I'd be quite happy to muddle through the bugs on SourceForge if
> > someone would flip my bug-db admin bit there.
I do occasionally go in there and delete old fixed or obsolete bug
reports.
BTW, someone should fix the web page so that it mentions the new release.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:58:43AM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote:
> Can we please, PLEASE turn on the bug-tracking system on Sourceforge?
> Or at least set up some kind of Bugzilla or something on hawk, maybe
> (if it could take it)?
>
> I'd be quite happy to muddle through the bugs on SourceForge if
> so
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:45:16AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:56:53AM -0700, Mr . Bad wrote:
> > Why is that? The code hasn't been worked on since it was originally
> > released, and all the same problems exist with it. It doesn't seem
> > like anything has changed since
On 4/26/01 1:22 PM, "Jan-Thomas Czornack" wrote:
> Yes, for several hours already.
There was a lookup problem trying to grab the stylesheet document. I have
fixed this problem in CVS. I am curious as to how it popped up several
hours after the switch to the translation site, but nevertheless, i
"Mr.Bad" writes:
> - application/unknown -> application/octet-stream
> - default filter to "on"
> - better XML-RPC default port
> - FCP default on
If XML-RPC isn't on by default, it would be nice if it were...
-S
k
___
On 4/26/01 1:09 PM, "Mr.Bad" wrote:
> Is the Web site down right now? I can't seem to get to it.
could someone update from CVS?
-rick
> ~Mr. Bad
___
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
> services.xmlrpc.port=8082
That's supposed to be 6690.
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
So it seems that there were a few buglets in 0.3.9 which should probably be
fixed before we announce the release. Among these is that I think filtering
should now be turned on by default.
We should re-release, get the windows release, and then we can announce.
Ian.
PGP signature
I have gotten several emails from people who want to post info into Freenet
targeting China in the last couple of weeks.
I am happy to see new sites in Freenet, but I am afraid that end users may
get in trouble because they overestimate the anonymity that the current
system affords. I have be
This seems to be a problem related to the new auto-translating website,
although I did a rebuild and it is working again.
If it happens again, I will investigate more deeply.
Ian.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 08:22:54PM +0200, Jan-Thomas Czornack wrote:
> Yes, for several hours already.
>
> Jantho
Great! Firstly, you should join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
Secondly, grab a sourceforge username and send it to me. Thirdly, read the
docs on sourceforge about using CVS. Fourthly, take a look at the existing web
structure to see how it works (it is pretty simple, stuff goes in www/lan
On 4/26/01 1:22 PM, "Jan-Thomas Czornack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, for several hours already.
There was a lookup problem trying to grab the stylesheet document. I have
fixed this problem in CVS. I am curious as to how it popped up several
hours after the switch to the translation site,
e
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010426/e90e0b8b/attachment.pgp>
Great! Firstly, you should join the web at freenetproject.org mailing list.
Secondly, grab a sourceforge username and send it to me. Thirdly, read the
docs on sourceforge about using CVS. Fourthly, take a look at the existing web
structure to see how it works (it is pretty simple, stuff goes in
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:58:43AM -0700, Mr.Bad wrote:
> Can we please, PLEASE turn on the bug-tracking system on Sourceforge?
> Or at least set up some kind of Bugzilla or something on hawk, maybe
> (if it could take it)?
>
> I'd be quite happy to muddle through the bugs on SourceForge if
> som
u.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010426/406da0b1/attachment.pgp>
From now on, if there are any significant changes to the website, you
should report them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that translators can do
their thing in a timely fashion.
Ian.
PGP signature
I was hand-updating my nodes to a cvs build, and as I was working through
the file I found the following in sample.freenetrc:
services.fcp.port=8082
services.xmlrpc.port=8082
Now, this is with the main trunk, and becuase freenetproject.org is so slow
right now I can't find out if it's just in the
Is the Web site down right now? I can't seem to get to it.
~Mr. Bad
--
~
Mr. Bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/
freenet:MSK@SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAge/pigdog+journal//
"Statements like this
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:56:53AM -0700, Mr . Bad wrote:
> Why is that? The code hasn't been worked on since it was originally
> released, and all the same problems exist with it. It doesn't seem
> like anything has changed since we originally decided to release with
> filtering turned off by def
I get the following when trying to request GJ's website (and can't successfully
request any other websites either).
This is from hawk.freenetproject.org, a Debian box, using IBM's 1.3 JDK.
Freenet.ConnectFailedException: Freenet.ConnectException:
java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host
> "IC" == Ian Clarke writes:
IC> I get the following when trying to request GJ's website (and can't
successfully
Yeh, I used to experience it, then one day it magically went away. Sometimes
the weird white window 'appears' very briefly and then 'disappears' again.
Haven't tried the 0.3.9 yet though.
I fixed it in my C port of freenet.exe along with the decidedly dodgy
practice of calling DestroyWindow() call
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:06:52AM -0700, Aaron Voisine wrote:
> er... yeah... I knew the data was encrypted. I didn't realize that the
> encryption rendered the data mostly random. I suppose that makes sense,
> recognizable patterns can't be good for security. I guess the only way to
> do it th
Hello,
I'm responding to the invitation for translators. (Found on:
http://freenet.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=translations )
I could make a Dutch translation for some parts of the Freenet website or
the program.
I'm a Dutch student in computer science and information technology in The
Netherl
> "IC" == Ian Clarke writes:
IC> So it seems that there were a few buglets in 0.3.9 which
IC> should probably be fixed before we announce the release.
BTW, I think this is a good idea. Maybe we should start doing releases
like 0.A.Bpre1 or something, and then do 0.A.B afterwards.
I'
Can we please, PLEASE turn on the bug-tracking system on Sourceforge?
Or at least set up some kind of Bugzilla or something on hawk, maybe
(if it could take it)?
I'd be quite happy to muddle through the bugs on SourceForge if
someone would flip my bug-db admin bit there.
~Mr. Bad
--
~
> "IC" == Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IC> So it seems that there were a few buglets in 0.3.9 which
IC> should probably be fixed before we announce the release.
IC> Among these is that I think filtering should now be turned on
IC> by default.
Why is that? The code h
Hi, I put the 0.3.9 Installer on Sourceforge, somebody needs to change the
weblink. So far I haven't got
my CVS to give me write access again.
I tried to install it and it worked fine. Does anybody else experiences the
"problem" of the empty
Freenet.exe window (which is supposed to be invisibl
Is the Web site down right now? I can't seem to get to it.
~Mr. Bad
--
~
Mr. Bad | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/
freenet:MSK at SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAge/pigdog+journal//
"Statements like this give the impressi
Yes, for several hours already.
Jantho
http://home.t-online.de/home/jantho_/
http://127.0.0.1:8081/MSK@SSK@MybRxkESI3p98XfweJzz3-VRZZIQAgE/Frost//
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mr.Bad
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 8:10 PM
>
> "IC" == Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IC> I get the following when trying to request GJ's website (and can't successfully
IC> request any other websites either).
IC> This is from hawk.freenetproject.org, a Debian box, using IBM's 1.3 JDK.
IC> Freenet.ConnectFailed
Can we please, PLEASE turn on the bug-tracking system on Sourceforge?
Or at least set up some kind of Bugzilla or something on hawk, maybe
(if it could take it)?
I'd be quite happy to muddle through the bugs on SourceForge if
someone would flip my bug-db admin bit there.
~Mr. Bad
--
~~
"Mr.Bad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - application/unknown -> application/octet-stream
> - default filter to "on"
> - better XML-RPC default port
> - FCP default on
If XML-RPC isn't on by default, it would be nice if it were...
-S
k
___
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 29 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010426/6d0c2053/attachment.pgp>
On 4/26/01 1:09 PM, "Mr.Bad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the Web site down right now? I can't seem to get to it.
could someone update from CVS?
-rick
> ~Mr. Bad
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listi
> "IC" == Ian Clarke writes:
IC> So it seems that there were a few buglets in 0.3.9 which
IC> should probably be fixed before we announce the release.
IC> Among these is that I think filtering should now be turned on
IC> by default.
Why is that? The code hasn't been worked on
I get the following when trying to request GJ's website (and can't successfully
request any other websites either).
This is from hawk.freenetproject.org, a Debian box, using IBM's 1.3 JDK.
Freenet.ConnectFailedException: Freenet.ConnectException:
java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host
> "IC" == Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IC> So it seems that there were a few buglets in 0.3.9 which
IC> should probably be fixed before we announce the release.
BTW, I think this is a good idea. Maybe we should start doing releases
like 0.A.Bpre1 or something, and then do 0
In sample.freenetrc of 0.3.9, it looks like
services.xmlrpc.port is set to 8082. So is services.fcp.port.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
__
Owen Williams wrote on 26.4.2001 00:49:47:
>
>I was wondering if someone knew an easier way of creating a system tray
>icon than the assembly (!!) implementation Freenet has. I need a tray
>icon for my own program (FreeSearch) because no one seems to be willing
>to deal with two windows on their
In sample.freenetrc of 0.3.9, it looks like
services.xmlrpc.port is set to 8082. So is services.fcp.port.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
___
- If somebody has access to the physical connection between you and
Freenet, they can both evesdrop and effect your traffic. Even if they
cannot change the data, they can still most probably get a good idea of
what you are doing.
- The addresses of nodes propogate around the network, so if you r
"Mr.Bad" wrote on 26.4.2001 00:12:12:
>Sebastian, if you get a chance, please build the installer and
>whatnot. Once that's done, I'll update the download page and put a
>notice in the Website news section.
I am on it, give me a minute...
___
Devl ma
Thanks for that. Afterwards I realised that I shouldn't be so lazy-assed in
my code, so I've chucked in a transparent datachunk unwrapping layer.
FYI - I'm cutting a simplified FCP C library, which will likely be viable as
the basis for alternative command line clients (get rid of need for existin
Michael Rogers wrote on 26.4.2001 05:16:37:
>
>On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:28:26AM +0300, Kalle A. Sandstrom wrote:
>> 1) Node impermanence. The network may be large (I've had 50-HTL requests
>> go unanswered with a timeout - this has to be a sign of *something*...),
>> but if a large percentage o
I was hand-updating my nodes to a cvs build, and as I was working through
the file I found the following in sample.freenetrc:
services.fcp.port=8082
services.xmlrpc.port=8082
Now, this is with the main trunk, and becuase freenetproject.org is so slow
right now I can't find out if it's just in th
I have gotten several emails from people who want to post info into Freenet
targeting China in the last couple of weeks.
I am happy to see new sites in Freenet, but I am afraid that end users may
get in trouble because they overestimate the anonymity that the current
system affords. I have b
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:06:52AM -0700, Aaron Voisine wrote:
> er... yeah... I knew the data was encrypted. I didn't realize that the
> encryption rendered the data mostly random. I suppose that makes sense,
> recognizable patterns can't be good for security. I guess the only way to
> do it t
ble
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010426/3c5fd8c5/attachment.pgp>
>
> er... yeah... I knew the data was encrypted. I didn't realize that the
> encryption rendered the data mostly random. I suppose that makes sense,
Yeah, thats what encryption does, make it indistinguishable from random
noise without the key.
> recognizable patterns can't be good for security
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 11:08:32PM -0700, Aaron Voisine wrote:
> Hey guys. I haven't been around for a while, so if this has already been
> discussed, I apologize. The major performance consideration with freenet
> is network lag. I think it would be beneficial to integrate zlib
> compression i
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:06:52AM -0700, Aaron Voisine wrote:
> > All the data on freenet is inserted after going through a round of
> > encryption and thus having the protocol do any compression is a waste of
> > resources becuase compression of the encrypted stream in most cases won't
> > compre
I just got both your reply and a "Delivery failed to ywwg at usa.net " at the
same time
... so ...
http://www.beermex.com/@spc/cmdinetray/
and
>From Aaron Voisine
>Hey guys. I haven't been around for a while, so if this has already been
>discussed, I apologize. The major performance consideration with freenet
>is network lag. I think it would be beneficial to integrate zlib
>compression into the freenet protocols, just like in HTTP 1.1.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 06:14:03PM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> From: "thelema"
>
> > MSKs (which don't exist anymore, but the concept of which exists in the
> current metadata spec).
>
> Huh??!?
> Is this true?
> Are MSKs being dropped from Freenet??
> What about all the MSK-based sites?
> If MS
Please bear in mind that the messages you discuss below are all
FCP messages. The FCP protocol is localhost-only, so we won't
save any network bandwidth by compressing FCP data transfers.
I don't know whether doing node to node compression has been discussed,
Hi, I put the 0.3.9 Installer on Sourceforge, somebody needs to change the weblink.
So far I haven't got
my CVS to give me write access again.
I tried to install it and it worked fine. Does anybody else experiences the "problem"
of the empty
Freenet.exe window (which is supposed to be invisib
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
