Hi JF,
this discussion should move to the tech list as it's not related to
day-to-day freenet development.
Anyways... I don't understand how you your idea will work. Where does the
executable code come from? How is it supposed to be executed? If untrusted
code is to be run on nodes, this is clear
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:45:33AM -0500, david at aminal.com wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:40:13AM -0500, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
<>
> > Thats hardly a reason. If the metadata points to the CHK of the data
> > thats an equally strong binding.
> >
>
> No it's not. It's only an assertion
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010511/3708f3f6/attachment.html>
The local cache of an insert looks just like the local cache of a Request
in 0.4. I don't see any problems beyond the general problem of multipart
caching, for which skipping one cache arbitrarily really isn't a good
solution.
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:17:36AM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> Are y
Before reading on see my site with 0.3.9.1 fred.
freenet:MSK at SSK@N41mJr-34ORwmu3IE3y1VfoPb6gQAgE/vegemite//
FProxy is encoding all the @s and /s for no darn good reason. The @'s are
okay this way but not the /'s. It causes a problem where if I use a relative
address as per GJ's examples for
for a FreeNet Process
> Hi JF,
>
> this discussion should move to the tech list as it's not related to
> day-to-day freenet development.
Ok I'll pose it there.
>
> Anyways... I don't understand how you your idea will work. Where does the
> executable code come from? How is it supposed to be exe
Has there been any discussion as to the possibility of creating a
FreeNet Process in the protocol.
This Process could have the following properties:
1) The executable would exists in the freenet, possibly split amongst many
nodes.
2) The process could be executed by determining its set of keys an
Are you going to get rid of local caching of inserts in 0.4? This fixes one
of my anti-anonymity attacks. Scipient(what is your real name) told me that
no one was doing it.
Also could you add config.nodes to 0.4 so I can set up a local Freenet on my
LAN for testing purposes?
David
--
David F
The inability of freenet users to use feedback forms like the web got me
thinking(Yes I do actually think!). This is an idea for FProxy includes.
Currently freesites like Snarfoo have to get people to use IndexClient to
insert their comments. This is a cumbersome process. My idea is for a specia
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:34:04PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:45:33AM -0500, david at aminal.com wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:40:13AM -0500, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> <>
> > > Thats hardly a reason. If the metadata points to the CHK of the data
> > > tha
for a FreeNet Process
> Hi JF,
>
> this discussion should move to the tech list as it's not related to
> day-to-day freenet development.
Ok I'll pose it there.
>
> Anyways... I don't understand how you your idea will work. Where does the
> executable code come from? How is it supposed to be ex
Hi JF,
this discussion should move to the tech list as it's not related to
day-to-day freenet development.
Anyways... I don't understand how you your idea will work. Where does the
executable code come from? How is it supposed to be executed? If untrusted
code is to be run on nodes, this is clea
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:34:04PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:45:33AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:40:13AM -0500, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> <>
> > > Thats hardly a reason. If the metadata points to the CHK of the data
> > > that
Has there been any discussion as to the possibility of creating a
FreeNet Process in the protocol.
This Process could have the following properties:
1) The executable would exists in the freenet, possibly split amongst many
nodes.
2) The process could be executed by determining its set of keys a
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:40:13AM -0500, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 10 May 2001 david at aminal.com wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 08:40:18AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> > > >From toad
> > >
> > > >It is a real problem because Brandon and others want to use highly
> >
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 03:06:44PM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From Mr.Bad
> > "BC" == Benjamin Coates writes:
> >
> >BC> What's the point of attaching this highly descriptive stuff to
> >BC> the file at all? Wouldn't this belong in an seperate
> >BC> indexing/searching laye
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:45:33AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:40:13AM -0500, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
<>
> > Thats hardly a reason. If the metadata points to the CHK of the data
> > thats an equally strong binding.
> >
>
> No it's not. It's only an assertion
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:40:13AM -0500, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 10 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 08:40:18AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> > > >From toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > >It is a real problem because Brandon and others want
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 03:06:44PM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From Mr.Bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > "BC" == Benjamin Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >BC> What's the point of attaching this highly descriptive stuff to
> >BC> the file at all? Wouldn't this belong in an sepe
The local cache of an insert looks just like the local cache of a Request
in 0.4. I don't see any problems beyond the general problem of multipart
caching, for which skipping one cache arbitrarily really isn't a good
solution.
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:17:36AM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> Are
This is from a brand new cvs build.
oierw at mewtwo:~/freenet$ freenet_insert chk@ file
+ java Freenet.client.InsertClient chk@ file
Freenet Core running on 1065 (build 390)
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
java.io.SequenceInputStream.nextStream(SequenceInputStream.java:98)
at jav
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:17:11AM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> The inability of freenet users to use feedback forms like the web got me
> thinking(Yes I do actually think!). This is an idea for FProxy includes.
> Currently freesites like Snarfoo have to get people to use IndexClient to
> inser
On Fri, 11 May 2001, David Findlay wrote:
> The inability of freenet users to use feedback forms like the web got me
> thinking(Yes I do actually think!). This is an idea for FProxy includes.
> Currently freesites like Snarfoo have to get people to use IndexClient to
> insert their comments.
~
On 10 May 2001, Mr.Bad wrote:
> > "BC" == Benjamin Coates writes:
>
> BC> Content-Type is how the client decides which viewer to pass
> BC> the data on to. Clients are unlikely to do anything at all
> BC> with things like "Description" or "Publisher" or "Title".
> BC> Thi
I agree whole-heartedly, with a couple of qualifications. First, the
formatting, which doesnt necessarily need to be binary, second, that more
complicated metadata is nice, but it does not have to be attached to the
data.
Scott
> > How about a compromise! We'll MANDATE the content-encodi
On Thu, 10 May 2001 david at aminal.com wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 08:40:18AM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> > >From toad
> >
> > >It is a real problem because Brandon and others want to use highly
> > >descriptive human written metadata, for example the Dublin Core stuff
> > >includes
This is from a brand new cvs build.
oierw@mewtwo:~/freenet$ freenet_insert chk@ file
+ java Freenet.client.InsertClient chk@ file
Freenet Core running on 1065 (build 390)
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
java.io.SequenceInputStream.nextStream(SequenceInputStream.java:98)
at java.
ot;HTTP/1.0 301 Moved Permanently\015\012");
pw.print("Connection: close\015\012");
pw.print("Location: "+loc+"\015\012");
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010511/ff2e2b71/attachment.pgp>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010511/60ed7d82/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:16:13AM -0700, Dev Random wrote:
> Can you please try the attached diff and let me know if it solves the problem?
And here is the actual diff. ;)
Index: HttpHandlerServlet.java
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/free
30 matches
Mail list logo
