[freenet-devl] Travis was right about Blackdown

2001-09-14 Thread Emil Mikulic
$ cat nohup.out # # HotSpot Virtual Machine Error, Internal Error # Please report this error at # http://www.blackdown.org/cgi-bin/jdk # # Error ID: 415353454D424C45523F491418160E43505001A3 # # Problematic Thread: prio=5 tid=0x8120368 nid=0x6648 runnable # I'll come back when I'm running Ka

Re: [freenet-devl] Updated version of fproxy servlet.

2001-09-14 Thread Gianni Johansson
On Thursday 13 September 2001 22:14, you wrote: > Hi Tavin: > > ... > There appears to be a BUG either in InternalClient or AutoRequester that > causes AutoRequester.doGet to intermittently succeeed returning no data. > This show up in fproxy as empty pages. It is very frequent when running > Fp

[freenet-devl] 0.4 on a full datastore

2001-09-14 Thread Travis Bemann
etproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010914/bd93e7e2/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-devl] 0.4 on a full datastore

2001-09-14 Thread t...@trapped-under-ice.com
Odd... I've been using it for about a month or so (Blackdown that is), and it seems to be performing quite well. I'm running it under a Debian woody system, though. Kaffe died on my constantly untill I got the patched CVS version (Thanks to the person on the list who pointed me there). Either one

Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 on a full datastore - crash log

2001-09-14 Thread Emil Mikulic
> > > Okay, now which JVM are you using? > > > > Blackdown 1.3.1 under RedHat 6.2. > > First thing - Blackdown is an absolute piece of shit. I've used it, > and it always crashed when I tried to start a Freenet node. > Therefore, I quickly switched to a patched CVS version of Kaffe, which > has

[freenet-devl] Freenet 0.4.3 pre-release now available

2001-09-14 Thread Scott G. Miller
ation/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010914/e736d5f4/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-devl] 0.4 on a full datastore

2001-09-14 Thread Emil Mikulic
> Can you verify that the node is actually coring and not fwproxy or > fcpproxy (No offense david, but Java rarely does that). It's the node. I don't use fwproxy and fcpproxy is left running. All the java processes die and I get a 100+ MB core. Seeya! -- Emil /**

Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet 0.4.3 pre-release now available

2001-09-14 Thread Scott G. Miller
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 03:29:24PM +0200, Sebastian Sp?th wrote: > Ian Clarke wrote: > > >Linux users should download and try out the pre-release of Freenet 0.4.3 > >available at: > > > >http://hawk.freenetproject.org/~ian/freenet-0.4.3.tgz > > > > Should we put out the current Win prerelease

Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 on a full datastore

2001-09-14 Thread toon
Odd... I've been using it for about a month or so (Blackdown that is), and it seems to be performing quite well. I'm running it under a Debian woody system, though. Kaffe died on my constantly untill I got the patched CVS version (Thanks to the person on the list who pointed me there). Either on

Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 on a full datastore

2001-09-14 Thread Travis Bemann
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:33:18AM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > > Okay, now which JVM are you using? > > Blackdown 1.3.1 under RedHat 6.2. First thing - Blackdown is an absolute piece of shit. I've used it, and it always crashed when I tried to start a Freenet node. Therefore, I quickly switche

Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet 0.4.3 pre-release now available

2001-09-14 Thread Sebastian Späth
Ian Clarke wrote: > Linux users should download and try out the pre-release of Freenet 0.4.3 > available at: > > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/~ian/freenet-0.4.3.tgz Should we put out the current Win prerelease as our first official Win release? It is still quite difficult to handle, but we

[freenet-devl] Freenet 0.4.3 pre-release now available

2001-09-14 Thread Sebastian Späth
Ian Clarke wrote: > Linux users should download and try out the pre-release of Freenet 0.4.3 > available at: > > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/~ian/freenet-0.4.3.tgz Yesterdays mail bounced due to a DNS error (hawk.freenetproject.org), so here it goes again: I am working with \x90 (as known o

[freenet-devl] 0.4 News

2001-09-14 Thread Sebastian Späth
Ian Clarke wrote: > On a lighter note, 0.4 seems to be working all of a sudden. It doesn't really work for me yet :-( > I have put together a cron job which will daily rebuild both Freenet 0.4 > and David McNab's fcptools from CVS, and place them in a .tgz package > suitable for use on Linux.

[freenet-devl] Please test fcpproxy

2001-09-14 Thread Sebastian Späth
Travis Bemann wrote: > Should I try this with the newest CVS (and how do > I get the right branch - I have no experience selecting CVS branches)? Just pull the default, there is no experimental stuff going on anymore AFAIK. The LENGTHY process (I added that warning as I had thought it had al

[freenet-devl] Conference Postponed

2001-09-14 Thread Adam Langley
http://conferences.oreilly.com/p2p/ "Due to the difficulties associated with air travel, and after careful consideration of the challenges facing the communities affected and the attendees, sponsors, and exhibitors, we are postponing the Peer-to-Peer and Web Services Conference in Washington, DC.

Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 on a full datastore

2001-09-14 Thread Emil Mikulic
> Okay, now which JVM are you using? Blackdown 1.3.1 under RedHat 6.2. Seeya! -- Emil /*/ main(k){printf((k>96?-1360352905:k>64?-1431660203:k>32?-823186585:2052) >>(k-1)&1?"##":" ");printf(k%32?"\0":"\n");return k==128?0:main

[freenet-devl] 0.4 on a full datastore

2001-09-14 Thread Scott G. Miller
/devl -- smog icy regret troll -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010914/8b234429/attachment.pgp>

Re: [freenet-devl] 0.4 on a full datastore

2001-09-14 Thread Scott G. Miller
Okay, now which JVM are you using? On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 05:07:46PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > > Can you verify that the node is actually coring and not fwproxy or > > fcpproxy (No offense david, but Java rarely does that). > > It's the node. > I don't use fwproxy and fcpproxy is left runni