$ cat nohup.out
#
# HotSpot Virtual Machine Error, Internal Error
# Please report this error at
# http://www.blackdown.org/cgi-bin/jdk
#
# Error ID: 415353454D424C45523F491418160E43505001A3
#
# Problematic Thread: prio=5 tid=0x8120368 nid=0x6648 runnable
#
I'll come back when I'm running Ka
On Thursday 13 September 2001 22:14, you wrote:
> Hi Tavin:
>
> ...
> There appears to be a BUG either in InternalClient or AutoRequester that
> causes AutoRequester.doGet to intermittently succeeed returning no data.
> This show up in fproxy as empty pages. It is very frequent when running
> Fp
etproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010914/bd93e7e2/attachment.pgp>
Odd... I've been using it for about a month or so (Blackdown that is), and
it seems to be performing quite well. I'm running it under a Debian woody
system, though.
Kaffe died on my constantly untill I got the patched CVS version (Thanks to
the person on the list who pointed me there).
Either one
> > > Okay, now which JVM are you using?
> >
> > Blackdown 1.3.1 under RedHat 6.2.
>
> First thing - Blackdown is an absolute piece of shit. I've used it,
> and it always crashed when I tried to start a Freenet node.
> Therefore, I quickly switched to a patched CVS version of Kaffe, which
> has
ation/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010914/e736d5f4/attachment.pgp>
> Can you verify that the node is actually coring and not fwproxy or
> fcpproxy (No offense david, but Java rarely does that).
It's the node.
I don't use fwproxy and fcpproxy is left running.
All the java processes die and I get a 100+ MB core.
Seeya!
-- Emil
/**
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 03:29:24PM +0200, Sebastian Sp?th wrote:
> Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> >Linux users should download and try out the pre-release of Freenet 0.4.3
> >available at:
> >
> >http://hawk.freenetproject.org/~ian/freenet-0.4.3.tgz
>
>
>
> Should we put out the current Win prerelease
Odd... I've been using it for about a month or so (Blackdown that is), and
it seems to be performing quite well. I'm running it under a Debian woody
system, though.
Kaffe died on my constantly untill I got the patched CVS version (Thanks to
the person on the list who pointed me there).
Either on
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:33:18AM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote:
> > Okay, now which JVM are you using?
>
> Blackdown 1.3.1 under RedHat 6.2.
First thing - Blackdown is an absolute piece of shit. I've used it,
and it always crashed when I tried to start a Freenet node.
Therefore, I quickly switche
Ian Clarke wrote:
> Linux users should download and try out the pre-release of Freenet 0.4.3
> available at:
>
> http://hawk.freenetproject.org/~ian/freenet-0.4.3.tgz
Should we put out the current Win prerelease as our first official Win
release? It is still quite difficult to handle, but we
Ian Clarke wrote:
> Linux users should download and try out the pre-release of Freenet 0.4.3
> available at:
>
> http://hawk.freenetproject.org/~ian/freenet-0.4.3.tgz
Yesterdays mail bounced due to a DNS error (hawk.freenetproject.org), so
here it goes again:
I am working with \x90 (as known o
Ian Clarke wrote:
> On a lighter note, 0.4 seems to be working all of a sudden.
It doesn't really work for me yet :-(
> I have put together a cron job which will daily rebuild both Freenet 0.4
> and David McNab's fcptools from CVS, and place them in a .tgz package
> suitable for use on Linux.
Travis Bemann wrote:
> Should I try this with the newest CVS (and how do
> I get the right branch - I have no experience selecting CVS branches)?
Just pull the default, there is no experimental stuff going on anymore
AFAIK. The LENGTHY process (I added that warning as I had thought it had
al
http://conferences.oreilly.com/p2p/
"Due to the difficulties associated with air travel, and after careful
consideration of the challenges facing the communities affected and
the attendees, sponsors, and exhibitors, we are postponing the
Peer-to-Peer and Web Services Conference in Washington, DC.
> Okay, now which JVM are you using?
Blackdown 1.3.1 under RedHat 6.2.
Seeya!
-- Emil
/*/
main(k){printf((k>96?-1360352905:k>64?-1431660203:k>32?-823186585:2052)
>>(k-1)&1?"##":" ");printf(k%32?"\0":"\n");return k==128?0:main
/devl
--
smog icy regret troll
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010914/8b234429/attachment.pgp>
Okay, now which JVM are you using?
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 05:07:46PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote:
> > Can you verify that the node is actually coring and not fwproxy or
> > fcpproxy (No offense david, but Java rarely does that).
>
> It's the node.
> I don't use fwproxy and fcpproxy is left runni
18 matches
Mail list logo