On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 05:42:57PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote:
< >
> > which: no jikes in
> > (/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr1/IBMJava2-13/bin:)
> > mkdir build
> > kaffe at/dms/kjc/Main -sourcepath src -d build src/freenet/client/*.java
> > Kjc: unre
izer.com/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020116/9f85df32/attachment.pgp>
> Edgar Friendly writes:
>
> > "gnutella fan" writes:
> >
> > > [...] In addition if I want to share something and I am not worried
> > > about the content I could keep it on my computer and not have to worry
> > > about it being lost from the network if I dont refresh it.
> > >
> > No. The n
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 05:59:33PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
<>
> Local requests (typically) go to the local node -- and if it already
> has the key, it won't route the request but will just return the data.
> So if a key is never expired (through luck, routing decisions, a
> "don't delete"
my node be up and running at this point?
>
Yes, your node should be running fine. Look at the log to see what it
has done.
> I closed the terminal and ran run.sh again in a new terminal window:
>
> Running Freenet: Done
> [030:/applications/freenet-20020116] philipp% ERROR: tcp/5339
e any store when up/down/grading.)
--
Robbe
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.ng
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020116/
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.ng
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020116/869f54fb/attachment.pgp>
be
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.ng
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020116/132aac91/attachment.pgp>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 06:40:26PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> I'm updating the Debian package to the new lowercase module right now.
>
> One problem is that is no longer used (even though the
> description of still mentions it).
>
> Could this paramater be reinstated and and be
> made r
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:19:14PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> I didn't even want to build for Kaffe, but it seems like the Makefile now
> defaults to prefer it over IBM or Sun.
It checks for jikes first, then kaffe, then javac, in the PATH.
make JAVAC=javac would prevent it from autodetecti
I used to be able to do a full build on my P233 machine in about a minute.
Now it now takes 7 minutes.
Is anyone else seeing this?
-- gj
--
Freesites
(0.3) freenet:MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage//
(0.4) freenet:SSK at npfV5XQijFkF6sXZvuO0o~kG4wEPAgM/homepage//
___
I didn't even want to build for Kaffe, but it seems like the Makefile now
defaults to prefer it over IBM or Sun.
But anyways there's a syntax error in the generated command line.
make
which: no jikes in
(/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr1/IBMJava2-
After some tweaking, I'm ready to say the tools are where I believe
they should be w/ respect to MSVC 6.0.
I've tagged the said tree "fcp_0_4_4".
I ask that any MSVC user please attempt to download a fresh copy and
compile the tools; I did that just now and it worked great for me. You
should
<>
> To make it simple, I'd make two programs. One that just uploaded a single
> .tgz,
> and the other which just downloaded, and installed it.
"Web site in a tarball" comes up every once and a while. We really just need
someone
to come along and hammer out code to do it (and please document h
ture.ng
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020116/0a2ace61/attachment.pgp>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 02:34:20PM +, Timm Murray wrote:
> > The target of this system would be, after large files were worked out, to
> > download a 650 meg game that my team will be distributing sometime this
> > fall.
>
> 650 megs is a bit large for Freenet at this point, but maybe (and th
Oskar Sandberg wrote:
>To not create problems for Junit, I don't want to give identical names
>to any classes unless they really are identical.
>
I understand this ... but:
There are no problem, as long s you create a strict subset of junits
functionality.
Problems start occuring, when providin
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 06:13:29PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote:
< >
> > If it keeps the classes from building with standard Junit then it
> > definitely should go - I never intended any imports from outside the
> > junit.framework package. If you want convenience just do:
> >
> > alias jtest="java ju
18 matches
Mail list logo
