On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:51:26PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
< >
> And I ask "why are we giving that information?" I don't see it being
> any use except to someone trying to trace the path of a request.
> Maybe it's useful for debugging (although I don't think we currently
> make _any_ use of
em today.
--
Robbe
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.ng
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020124/6d202853/attachment.pgp>
o!?
> Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!
> http://auctions.yahoo.com
>
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
The road to Tycho is paved with good intentions
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020124/606decaa/attachment.pgp>
Looking at my Inbound Contact Attempts, why do I see successful
connections to /my own node/ ?
-- Emil
___
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:45:46PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:51:26PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> < >
> > And I ask "why are we giving that information?" I don't see it being
> > any use except to someone trying to trace the path of a request.
> > Maybe it's usef
I'm doing inserts on 0.4 (at least)
using 23/1/2002 snapshot, linux 2.4.8
& fcptool of unknown (but recent) version
take from a snapshot of months ago, when it
were included with it (lenght 167196).
I'm using Kaffe 1.0.6 patched for server &
Sun 1.3.1_01 for fcptools (using kaffe for
b
> The core premise of the design of the new datastore is that it be
> completely impervious to termination of the application under any
> conditions which fall short of physically damaging the hard disk.
Could it be possible to extend the FSTool to doing a deep scan of the DS,
report errors and if
Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:51:52AM +0200, Jukka Holappa wrote:
>
>>I was just reading Ian's latest comments about datastore corruption
>>from mail archives and how it might get corrupted when processes get
>>killed unexpectly.
>>
>>Is it possible to install some kind of signal
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020124/b1d17c1f/attachment.pgp>
Is there any reason not to set the default of maxHopsToLive back up to 25
again? The current value is 15 which seems too small.
--gj
--
Freesites
(0.3) freenet:MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage//
(0.4) freenet:SSK at npfV5XQijFkF6sXZvuO0o~kG4wEPAgM/homepage//
On Thursday 24 January 2002 10:04, Marco wrote:
> I'm doing inserts on 0.4 (at least)
> using 23/1/2002 snapshot, linux 2.4.8
> & fcptool of unknown (but recent) version
> take from a snapshot of months ago, when it
> were included with it (lenght 167196).
>
> I'm using Kaffe 1.0.6 patched
On Thursday 24 January 2002 04:14, you wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 08:58:54PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > I have yet to reach 24 hours of uptime without having to reinitialize my
> > datastore.
> >
> > Just to be clear. I am not complaining (for a change ;-) ). We rushed
> > Tavin into
Tavin Cole writes:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 12:10:14PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> > My argument was that now you just get back a generic "QRej", without a
> > reason, you don't know which is the case. So an attacker can't use that
> > information to determine the path of a request.
> >
> >
On Thursday 24 January 2002 03:57, Tavin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:42:30PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > The CP mechanism is to keep track of which nodes are contactable.
> > Contactable means a) you can get transport level connectivity to the node
> > and b) the node's link crypto
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 12:10:14PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> > > > Adding a reason code to the QRej is probably a good idea on general
> > > > principle.
> > > >
> > > For the purposes of debugging, it's fine, but I like the fact that now
> > > you can't use QRej responses to determine wheth
On Thursday 24 January 2002 00:58, emil wrote:
> Looking at my Inbound Contact Attempts, why do I see successful
> connections to /my own node/ ?
>
The logging is per host not per node, so one explanation would be if you are
running multiple nodes on the same host.
If that's not the case, then th
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 03:32:59PM +0100, Are wrote:
> > The core premise of the design of the new datastore is that it be
> > completely impervious to termination of the application under any
> > conditions which fall short of physically damaging the hard disk.
>
> Could it be possible to extend
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:11:25AM -0800, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 06:54:05PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 08:58:54PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > > Are you saying that this is fixed?
> > > (Reported by Are)
> > > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/
Tavin Cole writes:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:22:07PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> > > Adding a reason code to the QRej is probably a good idea on general
> > > principle.
> > >
> > For the purposes of debugging, it's fine, but I like the fact that now
> > you can't use QRej responses to de
Ian Clarke wrote:
>Like most things in the world of Freenet, we discussed this so long ago I
>can't remember the details, but I do recall that our conclusion was that
>Java can't trap such things, at least, not in a cross-platform way.
>
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/api/java/lang/Runtime.html
chments/20020124/0235a49a/attachment.pgp>
: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020124/3298c1e4/attachment.pgp>
Hi,
I was just reading Ian's latest comments about datastore corruption
from mail archives and how it might get corrupted when processes get
killed unexpectly.
Is it possible to install some kind of signal handlers in Fred so you can
caught this signal (SIGTERM and perhaps others too) and shut d
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 08:58:54PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> I have yet to reach 24 hours of uptime without having to reinitialize my
> datastore.
>
> Just to be clear. I am not complaining (for a change ;-) ). We rushed Tavin
> into merging before he was really ready. The code seems to
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 07:59:14PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:51:52AM +0200, Jukka Holappa wrote:
> > I was just reading Ian's latest comments about datastore corruption
> > from mail archives and how it might get corrupted when processes get
> > killed unexpectly.
> >
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:42:30PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> The CP mechanism is to keep track of which nodes are contactable.
> Contactable means a) you can get transport level connectivity to the node and
> b) the node's link crypto accepts the key you used.
(Gianni:)
I have been thinki
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:22:07PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> > Adding a reason code to the QRej is probably a good idea on general
> > principle.
> >
> For the purposes of debugging, it's fine, but I like the fact that now
> you can't use QRej responses to determine whether a node is part of
Build 455 from latest CVS ... got lots of these while running Frost:
(freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, Thread-13): Severe execution error
freenet.fs.dir.DirectoryException: insertion collision in fragment size map
at freenet.fs.dir.FragmentSizeMap.put(FragmentSizeMap.java:30)
> about 10 hits per second from IP addresses in the 194.196.100.* subnet,
The network seems to be owned by IBM.. maybe they are working on a new
webspider? ;)
--
| Are ?rseth| elrond at idi.ntnu.no | http://ctemp.dhs.org/ |
| tlf: 73886876 | mob: 410 00548
_
29 matches
Mail list logo
