Re: [freenet-dev] Bandwidth limiting: client vs. net

2002-07-30 Thread Christopher William Turner
Local connections are not bandwidth limited. If your interface is 127.0.0.1 (i.e localhost as it should be for ssh) then bandwidth limiting does not apply. On Friday 26 July 2002 07:05, you wrote: > (Yes, I know that I'm complaining and not fixing, but java makes my > head hurt and I will never

Re: [freenet-dev] DataStore corruption

2002-07-30 Thread guardian
I've managed to prevent most corruption by doing 3 (or possibly 4, depending on how you count) things: 1) Set Datastore size to 50MB, using multiple store files (from storea to stores, I think) 2) Occasionally shutdown the freenet node, and make a backup of all datastore files. If datastore g

[freenet-dev] DataStore corruption

2002-07-30 Thread SiliconZealot
Well, the good news is that freenet filled my 2 Gig DataStore in just over a week. The bad news is that it has been corrupted again! This can't be good for routing if other nodes have a similar problem? I don't know how often this occurs for everyone... maybe put up a poll on freenetproje

Re: [freenet-dev] Implemented random first hop

2002-07-30 Thread Mika Hirvonen
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > Masquerading NATs do allow transient nodes to work normally, though. > > NO! Don't tell me how it works - I wrote the code in question and the > protcol specification. A Freenet node, transient or not, needs to be > able to accept new TCP connection