A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020802/56d8ff69/attachment.pgp>
Jay Oliveri (ilnero at gmx.net) wrote:
> I am committed to keeping the "stable" branch as stable as possible,
> only applying patches to fix show-stopping bugs. But for now, I'm
> heading to the beach :)
jekyll:~$ java -cp ~freenet/freenet.jar freenet.client.cli.Main
--FCPServerAddress pegasu
Greg Wooledge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Jay Oliveri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I am committed to keeping the "stable" branch as stable as possible,
> > only applying patches to fix show-stopping bugs.
Here's one, then.
Index: ezFCPlib/fcpOpenKey.c
Jay Oliveri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am committed to keeping the "stable" branch as stable as possible,
> only applying patches to fix show-stopping bugs. But for now, I'm
> heading to the beach :)
jekyll:~$ java -cp ~freenet/freenet.jar freenet.client.cli.Main --FCPServerAddress
pegas
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 09:47:03AM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
>
> guardian at ntplx.net writes:
>
> > I do agree with Oskar, that transient nodes have trouble getting data.
> > Should we be ignoring those forced to work behind a non-editable
> > firewall config? If freenet truly fails complete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd like to "release" version 0.4.7 of the tools, and create an
fcp_0_4_7 branch in CVS.
Compatible platforms:
* Windows (tested on 2K SP 2)
* Linux (Debian sid)
* FreeBSD (4.6)
(Solaris not yet supported)
(Check INSTALL.* and README for more info
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd like to "release" version 0.4.7 of the tools, and create an
fcp_0_4_7 branch in CVS.
Compatible platforms:
* Windows (tested on 2K SP 2)
* Linux (Debian sid)
* FreeBSD (4.6)
(Solaris not yet supported)
(Check INSTALL.* and README for more inf
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:35:09PM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote:
<>
> Unfortunately, my fproxy also seems completely hosed. It is as if it is
> single threaded or runs into deadlock sometimes. If I am retrieving a page
> in fproxy in one browser window and try to hit the main fproxy page in
> another
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 01:11:14AM +, Phil Marlowe wrote:
<>
> Oh, and here's a gripe related to the above: don't y'all think this project
> is too big for just one log file? If I turn the logging down low, I don't
> get the info I need. If I turn it on high, I have so much crap to wade
>
guardian at ntplx.net writes:
> I do agree with Oskar, that transient nodes have trouble getting data.
> Should we be ignoring those forced to work behind a non-editable
> firewall config? If freenet truly fails completely behind a NAT
> firewall, I think it needs to be fixed. How? I don't
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 09:47:03AM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I do agree with Oskar, that transient nodes have trouble getting data.
> > Should we be ignoring those forced to work behind a non-editable
> > firewall config? If freenet truly fails completely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I do agree with Oskar, that transient nodes have trouble getting data.
> Should we be ignoring those forced to work behind a non-editable
> firewall config? If freenet truly fails completely behind a NAT
> firewall, I think it needs to be fixed. How? I don't kno
I'd thought my earlier problem was due to a collsion between two versions of
the Java classes, resulting from a software install gone bad. But now I've
WIPED my hard drive, re-installed everything, and fproxy actually got worse!
Now it won't even bring up the intro page. It hangs the browser
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:35:09PM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote:
<>
> Unfortunately, my fproxy also seems completely hosed. It is as if it is
> single threaded or runs into deadlock sometimes. If I am retrieving a page
> in fproxy in one browser window and try to hit the main fproxy page in
> another
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 01:11:14AM +, Phil Marlowe wrote:
<>
> Oh, and here's a gripe related to the above: don't y'all think this project
> is too big for just one log file? If I turn the logging down low, I don't
> get the info I need. If I turn it on high, I have so much crap to wade
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
