[freenet-dev] splitfile block size

2002-09-10 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
erate the Graph fields, although they are required by the spec... -- Robbe -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.ng Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/at

[freenet-dev] splitfile block size

2002-09-10 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
me: signature.ng Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020910/1d5aea2a/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Problems with unix installer

2002-09-10 Thread Greg Wooledge
-- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020910/1ce30625/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Problems with unix installer

2002-09-10 Thread Matthew Toseland
eenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Looking for $coding (I'm cheap) -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachm

Re: [freenet-dev] Problems with unix installer

2002-09-10 Thread Greg Wooledge
Matthew Toseland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Somebody recently changed node.Main's behaviour so that if it had no > options, and found no config file, it did not run --config. The unix > installer ./start-freenet.sh depends on this. Please put it back. Why not fix start-freenet.sh instead? But

[freenet-dev] Directory implementations

2002-09-10 Thread Ian Clarke
ture Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020910/f89b35f1/attachment.pgp>

Re: [freenet-dev] Directory implementations

2002-09-10 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:37:58AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > It may make sense to implement several different types of store. > > a) Native filesystem, with one file per key, and the filename derived > > from the keyname (may n

Re: [freenet-dev] Directory implementations

2002-09-10 Thread Ian Clarke
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:37:58AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > It may make sense to implement several different types of store. > a) Native filesystem, with one file per key, and the filename derived > from the keyname (may need to escape some chars). Partially implemented > already, needs mo

FEC specs (was: Re: [freenet-dev] splitfile block size)

2002-09-10 Thread fish
On 9 Sep 2002, Edgar Friendly wrote: > > Can you point me to the FEC docuymentation, btw? I couldn't find it last > > time I looked, and I would be curious to see it (heh, I was just thinking > > that perhaps I should write some if no-one else has). > > > > - from fish with love > > The s

[freenet-dev] Directory implementations

2002-09-10 Thread Matthew Toseland
It may make sense to implement several different types of store. a) Native filesystem, with one file per key, and the filename derived from the keyname (may need to escape some chars). Partially implemented already, needs more implementation as well as debugging b) Native filesystem, with a mappin

Re: [freenet-dev] splitfile block size

2002-09-10 Thread fish
On 10 Sep 2002, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > Edgar Friendly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Pub/MetadataSpec > > > > The relevant options are CheckBlockCount and Graph.. The idea is > > simply that each check block is the XOR of a combination of d

[freenet-dev] fproxybindaddress = * IS broken

2002-09-10 Thread Philipp L
thanks. :) it's working for me. maybe someone should change this in the FAQ ? Am Montag, 09.09.02, um 18:10 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Ian Clarke: > Just add: > > nodeinfo.bindAddress=* > > to the config file. > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:51:05PM +0200, Philipp L wrote: >> several people noti

Re: [freenet-dev] splitfile block size

2002-09-10 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Edgar Friendly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Pub/MetadataSpec > > The relevant options are CheckBlockCount and Graph.. The idea is > simply that each check block is the XOR of a combination of data > blocks. Umm, it looks like FishFec does not gene

FEC specs (was: Re: [freenet-dev] splitfile block size)

2002-09-10 Thread Gianni Johansson
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 02:15, you wrote: > On 9 Sep 2002, Edgar Friendly wrote: > > > Can you point me to the FEC docuymentation, btw? I couldn't find it > > > last time I looked, and I would be curious to see it (heh, I was just > > > thinking that perhaps I should write some if no-one else

[freenet-dev] splitfile block size

2002-09-10 Thread fish
On 9 Sep 2002, Edgar Friendly wrote: > That's the best thing to do; it's a *very* reasonable assumption that . o O ( actully, pre FEC versions of fishtools inserted files at a non-power of 2 size, just size/desiredblocks :-p. yeah, i know it's wrong, but my point is, there is nothing stopping s

[freenet-dev] MIME-browser-check for users

2002-09-10 Thread fish
On 9 Sep 2002, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > > since most users don't have control over their server and can't set > > mime-types. > > It's hard to imagine a server where users allowed to edit content are > not allowed to influence mime types. Please elaborate. you may find it hard to imagine, but

[freenet-dev] splitfile block size

2002-09-10 Thread fish
On 9 Sep 2002, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > fish writes: > > > in the metadata for the main file, there is a 'SplitFile.BlockSize' > > entry, > > Not every insert tool seems to generate that. For example > SSK at FaP94HgrzsEY2BSW8rp4ZNHnAMUPAgM/cruft//reagan.mp3 has only the > total size. Don't

[freenet-dev] Major fproxy brokeness

2002-09-10 Thread Volker Stolz
2 URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020910/a41a5a28/attachment.mht>

Re: [freenet-dev] splitfile block size

2002-09-10 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Dan Merillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's redundant, since each piece is (size / numblocks) rounded to > the next power-of-two Is this spec'ed somewhere, or just how all notable implementations work? -- Robbe signature.ng Description: PGP signature

[freenet-dev] Problems with unix installer

2002-09-10 Thread Matthew Toseland
Somebody recently changed node.Main's behaviour so that if it had no options, and found no config file, it did not run --config. The unix installer ./start-freenet.sh depends on this. Please put it back. -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.

Re: FEC specs (was: Re: [freenet-dev] splitfile block size)

2002-09-10 Thread Gianni Johansson
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 02:15, you wrote: > On 9 Sep 2002, Edgar Friendly wrote: > > > Can you point me to the FEC docuymentation, btw? I couldn't find it > > > last time I looked, and I would be curious to see it (heh, I was just > > > thinking that perhaps I should write some if no-one els

Re: [freenet-dev] fproxybindaddress = * IS broken

2002-09-10 Thread Philipp L
thanks. :) it's working for me. maybe someone should change this in the FAQ ? Am Montag, 09.09.02, um 18:10 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Ian Clarke: > Just add: > > nodeinfo.bindAddress=* > > to the config file. > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:51:05PM +0200, Philipp L wrote: >> several people not

Re: [freenet-dev] Major fproxy brokeness

2002-09-10 Thread Volker Stolz
[Forwarded on Ian's request] -- http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/stolz/ *** PGP *** S/MIME --- Begin Message --- On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:42:54AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:59:55AM +0200, Volker Stolz wrote: > > In local.freenet, you wrote: > > > Those who tr