When looking at the probability of success of an incoming query,
(http://localhost:/servlet/nodestatus/psuccess_data.txt)
Do these probabilities refer to the chances of a success terminating
at my node, or the chances of any arbitrary request coming through my
node ending up successful?
--
Please do me a favor. Unssubscribe me!
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, fish wrote:
>
> I';ve gotten a few messages now like this one:
>
> "I also note that there were 6 blocks (the last of which is all zeros)
> and only 3 check blocks. For a 50% redundant FEC, shouldn't there be as
> many check blocks as the
Ian Clarke writes:
> They weren't "you screwed up" - that was clear, it was just a joke based on
> his typo - nobody was implying that he genuinely wanted something that
> turned a public key into a private key.
>
> I said it before, and I will say it again - Lighten up!
>
> Ian.
>
I approve
I';ve gotten a few messages now like this one:
"I also note that there were 6 blocks (the last of which is all zeros)
and only 3 check blocks. For a 50% redundant FEC, shouldn't there be as
many check blocks as there are normal blocks? Or do I understand it
wrong?"
So given that I'm sick of answ
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 09:52:38PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> > It's fine when one person politely points it out. I'd be afraid to
> > post again if every typo I made was greeted by 6 "you screwed up"
> > replies.
>
> They weren't "you screwed up" -
Ian Clarke writes:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 09:15:11PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> > I'm suprised that _everyone_ else on this thread has pointed out your
> > mistake (often derisively), and not even tried to answer the obvious
> > question. Please try to be constructive, people.
>
> Lighte
Matthew Toseland writes:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:24:37PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > to see if I am being overly strict or missing cases I would be happy. A
> > question is whether we should try to resolve DNS addresses to see if
> > they are real. I'm somewhat concerned about reveal
fish writes:
> On 3 Nov 2002, Edgar Friendly wrote:
>
> So I can't type. sue me :)
I'm suprised that _everyone_ else on this thread has pointed out your
mistake (often derisively), and not even tried to answer the obvious
question. Please try to be constructive, people.
>
> > As for the oppo
Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They weren't "you screwed up" - that was clear, it was just a joke based on
> his typo - nobody was implying that he genuinely wanted something that
> turned a public key into a private key.
>
> I said it before, and I will say it again - Lighten up!
>
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 09:52:38PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> It's fine when one person politely points it out. I'd be afraid to
> post again if every typo I made was greeted by 6 "you screwed up"
> replies.
They weren't "you screwed up" - that was clear, it was just a joke based on
his typ
ilable
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021104/176d592d/attachment.pgp>
When looking at the probability of success of an incoming query,
(http://localhost:/servlet/nodestatus/psuccess_data.txt)
Do these probabilities refer to the chances of a success terminating
at my node, or the chances of any arbitrary request coming through my
node ending up successful?
--
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Ian Clarke wrote:
> In general, it will require 20 times the total age of the universe to
> complete (assuming that you have a parallel computer with the same
> number of processors as atoms in the universe).
only 20 times? bah, i can wait! :-p
> Due to the long delay, we
Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 09:15:11PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> > I'm suprised that _everyone_ else on this thread has pointed out your
> > mistake (often derisively), and not even tried to answer the obvious
> > question. Please try to be constructive,
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 09:15:11PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> I'm suprised that _everyone_ else on this thread has pointed out your
> mistake (often derisively), and not even tried to answer the obvious
> question. Please try to be constructive, people.
Lighten up! It was just some good-natu
fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3 Nov 2002, Edgar Friendly wrote:
>
> So I can't type. sue me :)
I'm suprised that _everyone_ else on this thread has pointed out your
mistake (often derisively), and not even tried to answer the obvious
question. Please try to be constructive, people.
>
---
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021104/1c11621a/attachment.pgp>
Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:24:37PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > to see if I am being overly strict or missing cases I would be happy. A
> > question is whether we should try to resolve DNS addresses to see if
> > they are real. I'm somewhat con
>> In general, it will require 20 times the total age of the universe to
>> complete (assuming that you have a parallel computer with the same
>> number of processors as atoms in the universe).
>
> Java is the product of certain design trade-offs which, though cause
> for some temporary inconvenien
there is a quite grave bug in fishtools v3.0.11 throgh v3.0.13,
ironically, as a result of fixing someone else's bug. So, everyone who is
using fishtools needs to upgrade. now. v3.0.14 is available at
http://artificial-stupidity.net/~fish, or for the more squeemish,
fishtools edition #25 is pre
On 3 Nov 2002, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> fish writes:
>
> > is there an FCP command that I can feed in a public key and get out a
> > private key? (short of inserting something at HTL=0, which is what I'm
> > thinking of doing right now)
> >
> > - fish
>
> Of course not. Public -> privat
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Scott Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 12:34:07PM +1100, fish wrote:
> >
> > is there an FCP command that I can feed in a public key and get out a
> > private key? (short of inserting something at HTL=0, which is what I'm
> > thinking of doing right now)
> You medan
ployed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02.
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021104/fba65077/attachment.pgp>
Hi my name is Jose, and this is my first post, I'd wish this code be
useful for the project.
I'm waiting for your reply.
-RunScript.java-start-
/**
* This class is an attempt to embed Rhino (JavaScript) on fproxy.
* It is distributed under the GNU Pub
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:18:38PM +, Roger Hayter wrote:
<>
> Can I just ask for an explanation of this? Build 608 (and all since
> 525), maximum threads -120 (or 120 or -60 or 60) my node is currently
> showing pooled threads = 250, and on previous form this will increase
> until it is n
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:20:27PM -, Dave Hooper wrote:
> > Please do not use
> > the 0.6 as the overload threshold - with 80 threads that leaves only 12
> > for the node to process requests and new connections, which is far too
> > little.
>
> Bit of a dumbass question - what do all the thre
orge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02.
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021104/79608199/attachment.pgp>
ttachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021104/c8e6a68e/attachment.pgp>
store open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02.
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021104/3ae313ba/attachment.pgp>
ed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021104/a482ea0e/attachment.pgp>
My node is doing over ten thousands qph now without breaking a sweat, so
I'm fairly certain the problem is indeed fixed (though this is
partially due to the fact that almost none are successful). 609 is a
little better still since I reversed a conditional in 608 so it was
still accepting bad a
> Please do not use
> the 0.6 as the overload threshold - with 80 threads that leaves only 12
> for the node to process requests and new connections, which is far too
> little.
Bit of a dumbass question - what do all the threads actually *do*? As in,
what are the specific tasks that a thread does
In message <20021104124718.GA652 at sporty.spiceworld>, Oskar Sandberg
writes
>
>My node is doing over ten thousands qph now without breaking a sweat, so
>I'm fairly certain the problem is indeed fixed (though this is
>partially due to the fact that almost none are successful). 609 is a
>little b
While I realize that there is a great desire to make those who dare
to use Windows suffer as much as possible - displaying a message seen
by, I would guess, 90% of our users, which suggests that they should
start editing source-code, conveys a pretty bad impression of
Freenet's user-friendlines
sure you want to
> proceed, don't say we didn't warn you, and click req.getRequestURI() +
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi
Personal Homepage http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021104/bab82214/attachment.pgp>
is there an FCP command that I can feed in a public key and get out a
private key? (short of inserting something at HTL=0, which is what I'm
thinking of doing right now)
- fish
___
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.free
Ian Clarke:
> In general, it will require 20 times the total age of the universe to
> complete (assuming that you have a parallel computer with the same
> number of processors as atoms in the universe).
Java is the product of certain design trade-offs which, though cause for
some temporary incon
the major issue here is that most ofg teststream.ogg fell off the network
:). That's not to say this this isn't an issue (it is), and i'm owkring
on it. the current version (0.0.5) is more reliable, btw
- fish
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> I have to concur that fishst
>> In general, it will require 20 times the total age of the universe to
>> complete (assuming that you have a parallel computer with the same
>> number of processors as atoms in the universe).
>
> Java is the product of certain design trade-offs which, though cause
> for some temporary inconvenien
Ian Clarke:
> In general, it will require 20 times the total age of the universe to
> complete (assuming that you have a parallel computer with the same
> number of processors as atoms in the universe).
Java is the product of certain design trade-offs which, though cause for
some temporary incon
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 07:43:33AM -0800, Scott Miller wrote:
> P.S. YOU CAN EASILY DERIVE THE PUBLIC KEY FROM THE PRIVATE ONE,
> NOT VICE VERSA. :)
That teaches me to try to be funny when I am drunk...
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Pro
c: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021104/ac2fd14d/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 11:51:11PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> is there anyone (Goran?) running the current version of Fred compiled
> to native code with gcj successfully?
> I can build it fine, but the resulting binary will not hand stuff that
> is definitely in the datastore over to fproxy.
On November 4, 2002 07:47 am, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> My node is doing over ten thousands qph now without breaking a sweat, so
> I'm fairly certain the problem is indeed fixed (though this is
> partially due to the fact that almost none are successful). 609 is a
> little better still since I revers
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 08:22:10PM -0800, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/client/http
> In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv15765/src/freenet/client/http
>
> Modified Files:
> SplitFileRequestContext.java
> Log Message:
> A quick fix to make SplitF
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 12:26:06AM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Yes, I spent the weekend working on a new class -
> freenet.support.Factorize, and using it I have added a new FCP
> command. The syntax is this:
>
> Client -> Node:
>
> PrivateKey=
>
> Node -> Client:
>
> PublicKey=
>
> In gener
ype: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021104/95979297/attachment.pgp>
On November 3, 2002 04:24 pm, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> I think I have found the cause for the perfomance issues that many nodes
> have been seeing since the release of 0.5. It was the result of some bad
> protocol design on my part, that came to light with the combination of
> Matthew's more aggress
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:24:37PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
>
> I think I have found the cause for the perfomance issues that many nodes
> have been seeing since the release of 0.5. It was the result of some bad
> protocol design on my part, that came to light with the combination of
> Matt
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 09:39:28AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> John E. Mayorga ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > During the installation, it was suggested that 2500kb
> > (or something like that), so I typed in 2500.
>
> D'oh! If a data store less than N bytes is unable to function
> correctly,
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 01:23:20PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Anything applied to HEAD will appear in the next 0.5.x release (right
> now, this means 0.5.1).
It will not necessarily appear on 0.5.0.5, which may be necessary, if we
find out what the cause of the 100%-cpu-load bug is.
>
> Ian.
>
>
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 11:45:07AM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> - Forwarded message from "vollidiot @ uni. de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: lost gigabytes!
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> hi
> set node data store path exclusively fpr freenet
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:18:38PM +, Roger Hayter wrote:
<>
> Can I just ask for an explanation of this? Build 608 (and all since
> 525), maximum threads -120 (or 120 or -60 or 60) my node is currently
> showing pooled threads = 250, and on previous form this will increase
> until it is n
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:20:27PM -, Dave Hooper wrote:
> > Please do not use
> > the 0.6 as the overload threshold - with 80 threads that leaves only 12
> > for the node to process requests and new connections, which is far too
> > little.
>
> Bit of a dumbass question - what do all the thre
On November 4, 2002 07:47 am, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> My node is doing over ten thousands qph now without breaking a sweat, so
> I'm fairly certain the problem is indeed fixed (though this is
> partially due to the fact that almost none are successful). 609 is a
> little better still since I revers
> Please do not use
> the 0.6 as the overload threshold - with 80 threads that leaves only 12
> for the node to process requests and new connections, which is far too
> little.
Bit of a dumbass question - what do all the threads actually *do*? As in,
what are the specific tasks that a thread does
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Oskar Sandberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
My node is doing over ten thousands qph now without breaking a sweat, so
I'm fairly certain the problem is indeed fixed (though this is
partially due to the fact that almost none are successful). 609 is a
little better stil
My node is doing over ten thousands qph now without breaking a sweat, so
I'm fairly certain the problem is indeed fixed (though this is
partially due to the fact that almost none are successful). 609 is a
little better still since I reversed a conditional in 608 so it was
still accepting bad a
On November 3, 2002 04:24 pm, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> I think I have found the cause for the perfomance issues that many nodes
> have been seeing since the release of 0.5. It was the result of some bad
> protocol design on my part, that came to light with the combination of
> Matthew's more aggress
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 01:34, fish wrote:
>
> is there an FCP command that I can feed in a public key and get out a
> private key? (short of inserting something at HTL=0, which is what I'm
> thinking of doing right now)
>
> - fish
I hope you meant that the other way round.
In which case,
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Ian Clarke wrote:
> In general, it will require 20 times the total age of the universe to
> complete (assuming that you have a parallel computer with the same
> number of processors as atoms in the universe).
only 20 times? bah, i can wait! :-p
> Due to the long delay, we
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 05:08:36PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
<>
> I wouldn't try and resolve DNS addresses at each hop along the
> announcement path, but we can both cut down on invalid/bad
> announcements and allow for immediate feedback about whether a node
> can be contacted by others in the
Maybe it is time for Freenet not to delete files it didn't create...
Ian.
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 11:14:02PM -0800, Josh Steiner wrote:
> maybe its time for a *BIG RED FLASHY WARNING* to the "lusers" who are
> making this mistake to be plastered all over the website/download page,
> this is a r
Yes, I spent the weekend working on a new class -
freenet.support.Factorize, and using it I have added a new FCP
command. The syntax is this:
Client -> Node:
PrivateKey=
Node -> Client:
PublicKey=
In general, it will require 20 times the total age of the universe to
complete (assuming that
/kanzi
Personal Homepage http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021104/94c54ecb/attachment.pgp>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021104/581b3630/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 11:51:11PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> is there anyone (Goran?) running the current version of Fred compiled
> to native code with gcj successfully?
> I can build it fine, but the resulting binary will not hand stuff that
> is definitely in the datastore over to fproxy.
67 matches
Mail list logo
