On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:38:55PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:02:48PM -0800, Scott Miller wrote:
> > > If you guys want to be super paranoid about this, we can use a
> > > secret-sharing scheme or just multiple signatures,
When I generate the html manual it appears to be incomplete as it stops at the command
line switch --announcementThreads. If I on the other hand I use --help rather than
--manual I seem to get a more complete set of switches but without the default values
being described.
I'm sure this is a low
When I generate the html manual it appears to be incomplete as it stops at the
command line switch --announcementThreads. If I on the other hand I use --help
rather than --manual I seem to get a more complete set of switches but without
the default values being described.
I'm sure this is a low
The current distribution servlet functionality is better - but not
perfect. It shouldn't be necessary for the user to download the
required files from Freenet manually, this should happen automatically
in the background.
Additionally, the initial "Node distribution system" page gives the
newb
http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021115/074e13e9/attachment.pgp>
amphibian at users.sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021115/3cf6671f/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> fish in windoze is a dos pgm that xp wont allow it to assign its own
> buffer space, but it errors on socket buffer space right around were
> fish comments in his code about not bothering with gj's pagingi'm
> only guessing its related to that
I
in the usual place
> with the space in the directory path name,,,
Hmm. Why? It's not hard to discover freenet nodes, really.
>
> marvelous XP reset button otherwise,,
XP is so easy to crack, maybe we need to use that Trusted Computing
Platform Alliance stuff to assure that the
seland
toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
amphibian at users.sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021115/c66a0345/attachment.pgp>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:38:55PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:02:48PM -0800, Scott Miller wrote:
> > If you guys want to be super paranoid about this, we can use a
> > secret-sharing scheme or just multiple signatures, but store the private
> > keys on physical security t
hey all, i've been trying to download some .ogg files from the "ebm is
dead" freesite (nice work, whoever you are ;) and i've noticed a nasty
little bug: since the files are pretty big i'm getting quite a few
DNF's, but if it can't find enough chunks to build up the whole file and
it fails, i
hey all, i've been trying to download some .ogg files from the "ebm is
dead" freesite (nice work, whoever you are ;) and i've noticed a nasty
little bug: since the files are pretty big i'm getting quite a few
DNF's, but if it can't find enough chunks to build up the whole file and
it fails, i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> paging for acutally large files over the 128 meg limit
>> wud be really nice to not get buffer errors all the time
>Sorry, I don't follow you. Insertions of 230M+ files work fine AFAIK
>(that Enterprise site, for example).
>>
I'm talking fishtools, the web p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> paging for acutally large files over the 128 meg limit
>> wud be really nice to not get buffer errors all the time
>Sorry, I don't follow you. Insertions of 230M+ files work fine AFAIK
>(that Enterprise site, for example).
>>
I'm talking fishtools, the web p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:18:33 -0800 Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 06:56:18AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Sorry to chirp into developer space,,
>Much as I would normally welcome well informed comments from one
>of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:18:33 -0800 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 06:56:18AM -0800, kaboom at hush.com wrote:
>>
>> Sorry to chirp into developer space,,
>Much as I would normally welcome well informed comments from one
>of the
>biggest user
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 07:23:38AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Insert files.
> >> For each file:
> >> if fetchable on all nodes, continue to next file
> >> for each extra node, (in parallel?):
> >> try to fetch at current HTL
> >> if RNF, retry with same options
> >> if DNF, and HT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It seems that the main question about distributing the freenet jar is this: how
do people who install these know
they're not trojan versions?
Are the .jar files going to be gpg signed with the public key and fingerprint
available on the website, or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 02:39:53 -0800 Oskar Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:38:55PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:02:48PM -0800, Scott Miller wrote:
>> > If you guys want to be super paranoid about this, we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 02:39:53 -0800 Oskar Sandberg
wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:38:55PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:02:48PM -0800, Scott Miller wrote:
>> > If you guys want to be super paranoid about this, we can use
>a
>> > s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 04:33:06 -0800 fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
>> Recently I inserted a file at HTL 20 into one of my nodes, and
>had it
>> DNF on the other at HTL 25. For two different files. This worked
>i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 04:33:06 -0800 fish wrote:
>
>On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
>> Recently I inserted a file at HTL 20 into one of my nodes, and
>had it
>> DNF on the other at HTL 25. For two different files. This worked
>in the
>> past, with
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 06:56:18AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Sorry to chirp into developer space,,
Much as I would normally welcome well informed comments from one of the
biggest users of freenet...
>
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:22:29 -0800 Edgar Friendly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Matt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:18:23 -0800 Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:52:35PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> How do we distribute the required files for the distribution servlet?
>
>Oh, if only we had some kind of decentralize
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:18:23 -0800 Ian Clarke wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:52:35PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> How do we distribute the required files for the distribution servlet?
>
>Oh, if only we had some kind of decentralized, and preferably a
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:42:12AM -0600, GeckoX wrote:
> It seems that the main question about distributing the freenet jar is this: how do
>people who install these know
> they're not trojan versions?
The same applies to the seednodes, which cannot be signed centrally
because the whole point i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Sorry to chirp into developer space,,
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:22:29 -0800 Edgar Friendly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:15:41PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
>> Um, the Distribution Servlet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Sorry to chirp into developer space,,
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:22:29 -0800 Edgar Friendly wrote:
>Matthew Toseland writes:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:15:41PM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
>> Um, the Distribution Servlet is absolutely necessary. The current
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It seems that the main question about distributing the freenet jar is this: how do
people who install these know
they're not trojan versions?
Are the .jar files going to be gpg signed with the public key and fingerprint
available on the website, or
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:38:55PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:02:48PM -0800, Scott Miller wrote:
> > > If you guys want to be super paranoid about this, we can use a
> > > secret-sharing scheme or just multiple signatures,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:38:55PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:02:48PM -0800, Scott Miller wrote:
> > If you guys want to be super paranoid about this, we can use a
> > secret-sharing scheme or just multiple signatures, but store the private
> > keys on physical security t
- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021115/f28679fe/attachment.pgp>
ture
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021115/1b1a5aad/attachment.pgp>
forge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
De
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, fish wrote:
>
> okay, so in an attempt to desperatly try and redeem myself, I finally got
> off my fat lazy ass and learned python's distutils stuff.
>
> nothing has changed in
> http://www.dspaudio.com/~jaymz/fishstream-0.0.8.tar.gz, except for the
> fact that (a) people
35 matches
Mail list logo
