Sorry... easier to read...Upping Last Good Build was: Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of transient and ipaddress settings

2002-11-26 Thread SiliconZealot
>> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:05:54AM -0500, SiliconZealot wrote: >> Matthew - What of the release builds do you think should be the minimum to >> run freenet? (from a technical/bugfixing/routing viewpoint) >> >> Which Package? 0.5.0.5...etc... >I don't know. At this point, there are important

[freenet-dev] DBR sites

2002-11-26 Thread Matthew Toseland
Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021126/8a556a79/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Possible Distribution servlet problem.

2002-11-26 Thread Matthew Toseland
not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021126/2cc01880/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] DBR sites

2002-11-26 Thread hailstormxp
I don't know how exactly DBR sites work but I was wondering if it would be possible to change it so that uploading the site every day isn't required. Would it be possible to have it just point to the last published edition? I know that this is what edition based sites are for but DBR sites seem

[freenet-dev] Possible Distribution servlet problem.

2002-11-26 Thread Roger Hayter
Build 624. I tried out the distribution servlet, and it worked to the extent of setting up a usable page from which I could download a zip file. I did not set the distribution directory, which I think therefore defaults to the current directory. (Freenet is on a 500MB disk so there is not a

[freenet-dev] unkown parameters... (NodeConfig)

2002-11-26 Thread Trevor Smith
# Unknown parameters - these are not yet known or handled by the NodeConfig# utility, but are assumed to be valid and understandable to the node# if you see this in the file, then please email the parameters following# this comment header to [EMAIL PROTECTED], to prompt the developers# into

[freenet-dev] DBR sites

2002-11-26 Thread hailstormxp
I don't know how exactly DBR sites work but I was wondering if it would be possible to change it so that uploading the site every day isn't required. Would it be possible to have it just point to the last published edition? I know that this is what edition based sites are for but DBR sites seem

Re: [freenet-dev] Possible Distribution servlet problem.

2002-11-26 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:19:58AM +, Roger Hayter wrote: Build 624. I tried out the distribution servlet, and it worked to the extent of setting up a usable page from which I could download a zip file. I did not set the distribution directory, which I think therefore defaults to the

Re: [freenet-dev] DBR sites

2002-11-26 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:29:10PM +, hailstormxp wrote: I don't know how exactly DBR sites work but I was wondering if it would be possible to change it so that uploading the site every day isn't required. Would it be possible to have it just point to the last published edition? NO. Find

Re: [freenet-dev] DBR sites

2002-11-26 Thread fish
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, hailstormxp wrote: I don't know how exactly DBR sites work but I was wondering if it would be possible to change it so that uploading the site every day isn't required. Would it be possible to have it just point to the last published edition? you can change it to any

Sorry... easier to read...Upping Last Good Build was: Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of transient and ipaddress settings

2002-11-26 Thread SiliconZealot
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:05:54AM -0500, SiliconZealot wrote: Matthew - What of the release builds do you think should be the minimum to run freenet? (from a technical/bugfixing/routing viewpoint) Which Package? 0.5.0.5...etc... I don't know. At this point, there are important bugfixes on