tps://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021231/aed613fd/attachment.obj>
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 08:25:54AM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> Try setting
>
> outputBandwidthLimit=6000
>
> to limit to 6K/sec
The 'outputBandwidthLimit=1' was just an example to show it doesn't
work, it doesn't work at higher settings either.
--
Frank v Waveren
On Tuesday 31 December 2002 09:43 am, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> If anyone is using a current linux 2.5 kernel, the following patch
> may be of interest. It lets you run you freenet node at nice 0
> without a busy node 'stalling' your system. Patch generated on
> 2.5.53 but will probably work with
Eugh. I cringe at yet another misleading zeropaid news story on Freenet.
They seem to have got in their minds that somehow Locutus is some kind
of successor to Freenet. *Sigh* Oh well, that's zeropaid for you :/
___
devl mailing list
devl at
At 22.50 30/12/02 +, you wrote:
>> Do what we do for external links - force "__CSS__" to be prepended to=20
>> the URL for external stylesheets, and then make FProxy filter those=20
>> pages when retrieved irrespective of their mime type.
When working on filter code, please insert some form
Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> If nobody comes up with a better solution, we're going to have to
> disable link rel=stylesheet, link type=*, and link charset=*... we may
> as well just disable the LINK tag. One consequence of this is banning
> external stylesheets. Anyone got a better idea?
Also
If anyone is using a current linux 2.5 kernel, the following patch
may be of interest. It lets you run you freenet node at nice 0
without a busy node 'stalling' your system. Patch generated on
2.5.53 but will probably work with most recent 2.5 kernels.
Comments?
Ed Tomlinson
--
On December 30, 2002 07:01 pm, Frank v Waveren wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 10:51:05PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > What exactly did you set? The appropriate lines from your freenet.conf
> > would be useful.
>
> bandwidthLimit=0
> inputBandwidthLimit=0
> outputBandwidthLimit=1
>
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 10:51:05PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> What exactly did you set? The appropriate lines from your freenet.conf
> would be useful.
bandwidthLimit=0
inputBandwidthLimit=0
outputBandwidthLimit=1
%averageBandwidthLimit=0
%averageInputBandwidthLimit=0
On December 30, 2002 07:01 pm, Frank v Waveren wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 10:51:05PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
What exactly did you set? The appropriate lines from your freenet.conf
would be useful.
bandwidthLimit=0
inputBandwidthLimit=0
outputBandwidthLimit=1
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 08:25:54AM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Try setting
outputBandwidthLimit=6000
to limit to 6K/sec
The 'outputBandwidthLimit=1' was just an example to show it doesn't
work, it doesn't work at higher settings either.
--
Frank v Waveren
Eugh. I cringe at yet another misleading zeropaid news story on Freenet.
They seem to have got in their minds that somehow Locutus is some kind
of successor to Freenet. *Sigh* Oh well, that's zeropaid for you :/
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If anyone is using a current linux 2.5 kernel, the following patch
may be of interest. It lets you run you freenet node at nice 0
without a busy node 'stalling' your system. Patch generated on
2.5.53 but will probably work with most recent 2.5 kernels.
Comments?
Ed Tomlinson
--
On Tuesday 31 December 2002 09:43 am, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
If anyone is using a current linux 2.5 kernel, the following patch
may be of interest. It lets you run you freenet node at nice 0
without a busy node 'stalling' your system. Patch generated on
2.5.53 but will probably work with most
Matthew's latest Unstable code check-in (12-30-02) does not compile on Sun
JVM 1.4.1_01-b01.
I routinely am able to compile and run from CVS without issue.
Last night's snapshot seems to be ok, what is that compiled with?
Attached is my slightly modified build.bat file (as the official
15 matches
Mail list logo
