On Saturday 07 June 2003 11:29 am, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> On Saturday 07 June 2003 11:00 am, Toad wrote:
> > > I should point out, that if your container is large enough to FEC
> > > (that's around a meg), then your container is too fucking big - in
> > > ideal conditions, (i.e. not freenet), a 56k
Can someone briefly list what FCP functionality is missing in the current
revision of the documentation? What Greg posted to the list:
(http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/pipermail/devl/2003-June/006357.html)
was the version on the old website. Since then some ideas have been thrown
around a
>An effect of the above mentioned NPE is that the node starts consuming
>100% CPU until it is shut down (it might be spawning an unlimited number
>of threads or something).
>Just catching the NPE and doing a continue; seems to leave the node in a
>suprisingly working state (at least for loca
Mmm yeah. I use a 56k modem, many major figures in the Freenet community use a 56k modem, as well. You are not designing for an elitist broadband network. You have to make things work for 56k modems too.
On Saturday 07 June 2003 11:00 am, Toad wrote:
> > I should point out, that if your container is large enough to FEC (that's
> > around a meg), then your container is too fucking big - in ideal
> > conditions, (i.e. not freenet), a 56k modem (which are very common,
> > despite what some of the broa
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 10:42:26AM +0200, Thomas Leske wrote:
> fish wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 07:57:02PM +0200, Thomas Leske wrote:
> > > One could also solve the two problems without containers:
> > > 1) completeness:
> > > Make FEC work for sets of small files. The regular files are
>
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:06:22PM +1000, fish wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 07:57:02PM +0200, Thomas Leske wrote:
> > Menno Jonkers wrote:
> > > But that may take a while. In the mean time a pragmatic, low impact way
> > > to improve speed and completeness of site retrieval could greatly
> >
fish wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 07:57:02PM +0200, Thomas Leske wrote:
> > One could also solve the two problems without containers:
> > 1) completeness:
> > Make FEC work for sets of small files. The regular files are
> > just inserted normally. The zip archiv is only generated on the sid
