On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 11:08:02AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Error: Only report major errors.
> Normal: Report major errors and normal events.
> Minor: Report major errors, normal events, and minor events.
> Debug: Report major errors, normal events, minor events, and anything else
> that
There have been a great number of changes to NativeFSDirectory lately.
Unfortunately few by me. I've glanced at them but not enough to
guaranty their stability. I did however update my node from CVS at
12:54a EDT this morning and I still have 145GB in my store.
-Pascal
On Wednesday 09 July 20
Recently logged messages:
Priority legend: Error, Normal, Minor, Debug
Time Message Exception
15:44:25 RouteNotFound Fetching ARK freenet:[EMAIL PROTECTED],DT-LbhbMK7iqqKaVSzDB87JdQpj1npy7nn8NeWOQfM4/e null
16:01:54 Getting thread to dispatch in PublicInterface took more than 10 seconds! If this h
On 7/5/2003 4:05 PM, Toad wrote:
We need people running Win9X (95, 98, 98SE, ME) to test it and tell us
if it actually works on that platform... it should, but we shall see.
I started it at 6:06 p.m., and here's the result after about half an
hour. I still can't get the Web interface, so I can't
Sorry if I sounded upset over this.
> Yeh, perhaps. On the other hand, do you often go round running
> undocumented executables? I don't. :-)
Right now, I've seen that when people move from 59x to a nio build, some of the
settings change, like the cache size being reset to 0, or in my case to
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 08:23:09PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> Pascal,
>
> How robust are your lastest ds changes? I just noticed my ds droppped from 8G to
> 178M.
> This could have happened anytime yesterday or today. Running unstable from cvs.
>
> Ideas,
> Ed
It doesn't matter much, _my_
Rejecting queries is EVIL. SOLVE the problem.
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 02:50:13PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > However, no matter how fast the outoing link is, as long as the downlink is
> > faster the node ends up piling up data on the send Queu
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:45:44PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 July 2003 12:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > now that high-cpu usage and overloads are mostly solved and ...
>
> I hate to sound like a broken record here, but the high-CPU usage and overload
> problems are NOT S
Unstable build 6091 is in CVS, the snapshots are regenerated. The major
change is that we now use both a hashtable and a skiplist in the
datastore (NativeFSDirectory). This should drastically speed up
DS.getClosestKeys, (used by successful announcements), and eliminate the
memory spikes that Iakin
Pascal,
How robust are your lastest ds changes? I just noticed my ds droppped from 8G to 178M.
This could have happened anytime yesterday or today. Running unstable from cvs.
Ideas,
Ed
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetprojec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> please revert you freenet.jar from freenet.jar.old (or what it's called) if
> your .old jar is zero bytes, too, you're really f*cked because then you
> have killed your freenet software by overwriting with 0-sized files ;))
I gave toad a patch for
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 04:15:16AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > Bullshit. Freenet will not work in hostile environments because a truly
> > hostile regime would ban it and set up a node harvester.
>
> This attitude is fine in a world where Chinese and other dissidents will
> patiently put their e
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:29:24PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> Now that NIO is implemented, could we have a 'Firewall mode', where a node
> does not advertise itself like a transient node. Instead it makes lots of
> outgoing connections that it mantains open. This way nodes that it connects
>
Well, I definitely agree to this. Currently I have about 400 seconds of
sendqueue laying around here (after only 4h of uptime).
I am wondering though.. wouldn't NGRouting sort of solve this automatically?
/N
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wedn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> However, no matter how fast the outoing link is, as long as the downlink is
> faster the node ends up piling up data on the send Queue.
You mean "as long as other people's downlinks are faster".
> I. The faster way is to make the node QR any incomi
I'm using build 5007.
Upon startup of the node I get the following output to the terminal where
I started it:
dump of interesting objects after gc in checkpoint:
tcpConnections 11
tcpConnections open 10
size of socketMap 10
FnpLinks 8
PlainLinks 0
NIOOS 10
NIOIS 10
CH 7
CHIS 0
CHOS 0
RIS 0
SOS 0
http://pmd.sourceforge.net/reports/freenet_freenet.html
Could help us clean up the code a bit.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/
Founder, Locutus
Then the questions becomes, Why aren't they? Perhaps the project should
mention it in the Documentation, or at LEAST the FAQ.. (Why is Freent so
slow?)
Colin
> > I'm reading all these possibilities for prefetching in
> freenet, but I
> > guess I'm still not really clear what is being gained ove
Perhaps this should go into the documentation, or at LEAST the FAQ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Wooledge
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] UI suggestions - precaching
michael (
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Tomlinson
> Sent: den 9 juli 2003 12:15
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tom Kaitchuck
> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Firewalled mode?
>
>
> On July 8, 2003 09:29 pm, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> > Now that NIO
And you did type the right name for the jar and so?
/N
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of pineapple
> Sent: den 9 juli 2003 12:21
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [freenet-dev] bad build
>
>
> Just tried updating to the latest stab
the update scripts and eerything else is not working, because
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/... is not accessible at this moment.
so wget and others will return einter a 404 or a zero-byte sized file,
called freenet.jar
this is no valid jar archive when called via java -jar freenet.jar,
With current CVS (6090), after running for about an hour with no
problems, fred dumps the below to the log a few hundred times a second
until I kill it.
-Pascal
Jul 9, 2003 12:59:08 PM (freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop, read
interface thread, ERROR): Caught throwable in AbstractSelectorLoop!
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 12:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> now that high-cpu usage and overloads are mostly solved and ...
I hate to sound like a broken record here, but the high-CPU usage and overload
problems are NOT SOLVED! My CPU is constantly at 100% this seems a bit worse
on 5007 compa
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:16:45PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck spake thusly:
> (freenet.fs.dir.LossyDirectory, QThread-10, ERROR): insufficient storage:
> tried to delete 3919 files out of 3917, need 2216 bytes, have -164925440
> java.io.IOException: insufficient storage: tried to delete 3919 files out o
now that high-cpu usage and overloads are mostly solved and the routingTime
rarely goes over 50ms, we need to address the newly arised bottleneck of
bandwith. Uplink is and will remain the scarcest resource for any
distributed/p2p network for quite some time, and the days when MIT kids with
10MB
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 09:04 pm, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> More random errors apearing on stderr. (These are from 5005)
> PS: Is the current freenet-latest.jar broken? I can't get it to launch.
The reason I couldn't seem to load it up to the web interface, was probably
related to this type of error
FYI everything should now be back to normal with email and the website
as I have renewed the freenetproject.org domain. Unfortunately, the
renewal warnings had been killed by my anti-spam software, time to find
something new me-thinks - and with me travelling, the timing could not
have been wo
Todd Walton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Error, Normal, Minor, Debug
>
> are they cumulative? I mean, does normal log everything error does plus
> some?
Yes.
--
Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers
ht
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 08:19 am, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> michael ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I'm reading all these possibilities for prefetching in freenet, but I
> > guess I'm still not really clear what is being gained over the
> > prefetching built into mozilla. (You are using mozilla, righ
Error: Only report major errors.
Normal: Report major errors and normal events.
Minor: Report major errors, normal events, and minor events.
Debug: Report major errors, normal events, minor events, and anything else that can possibly be reported.
That;s the way I thought of it.
They're mostly using some non-IE browser luckily. I use Firebird, because Mozilla is deprecated now...
The log level setting confuses me. I can't seem to intuitively figure out
where each level stands. Of the four:
Error, Normal, Minor, Debug
are they cumulative? I mean, does normal log everything error does plus
some? Does Minor log everything error and normal do, plus some? And does
debu
michael ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm reading all these possibilities for prefetching in freenet, but I
> guess I'm still not really clear what is being gained over the
> prefetching built into mozilla. (You are using mozilla, right?)
No, most people *aren't* using it.
--
Greg Wooledge
Just tried updating to the latest stable build and I
get the following error:
Exception in thread "main" java.util.zip.ZipException:
error in opening zip file
at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method)
at java.util.zip.ZipFile.(Unknown
Source)
at java.util.jar.JarFile.(
On July 8, 2003 09:29 pm, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> Now that NIO is implemented, could we have a 'Firewall mode', where a node
> does not advertise itself like a transient node. Instead it makes lots of
> outgoing connections that it mantains open. This way nodes that it connects
> to can still make r
> Sorry if I sounded upset over this.
You didn't, it's cool
>> Yeh, perhaps. On the other hand, do you often go round running
>> undocumented executables? I don't. :-)
>
> Right now, I've seen that when people move from 59x to a nio build, some
> of the settings change, like the cache size bei
37 matches
Mail list logo
