On Friday 11 July 2003 10:46 pm, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> > > > > Please try build 5008, it has significant changes in this area.
> > > > No change.
> > What (memory, CPU) are you trying to run Freenet on? And what load level
> > are you getting (Network Load infolet).
> 512MB 1.53ghz with 192 megs f
Request failed gracefully: Next failed: Unexpected Exception:already
released file tbf_6a6550a0 BUT IT STILL EXISTS!
Click here to retry.
This happened on the second try of downloading a splitfile (first try failed
due to not enough blocks)
/N
__
> Would seem to have bug in it... setting a bandwidthlimit to 0 (or using
the
> default which is 0) actually means just that.. if you want unlimited bw
then
> set it to something large.
I was wrong. The problem was that 0 was not the default value anymore (and I
used the default). If you want unli
With 24 hours old code:
Jul 11, 2003 10:34:31 PM (freenet.node.states.request.TransferReply,
QThread-3765, NORMAL): Failed to send data with CB 0x83 (CB_RECV_CONN_DIED),
for freenet.node.states.request.TransferReply:
key=0ba3e21d3ac1e4e25e89beffb219132d7d9a5262140302, hopsToLive=16,
id=b801c8f1213
Would seem to have bug in it... setting a bandwidthlimit to 0 (or using the
default which is 0) actually means just that.. if you want unlimited bw then
set it to something large.
/N
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org
> I don't see were that is being done, but I'll take your word for it.
The call to 'Select' causes the thread to stay waiting until there are data
to be read from the network (at which point the thread will do that instead
for a while)..
>But what
> about this:
>
> if(isWi
And loglevel 'Normal'...
/N
- Original Message -
From: "Niklas Bergh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:00 PM
Subject: [freenet-dev] More about memory useage
> With -Xmx128mb configured:
>
> Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit)719 (441/278/7
